Truth Is Its Own Excuse for Being
Truth Is Its Own Excuse For Being
In the summer edition, we published Bill Lockwood's response to the
problem of Sarah's seminal emission that was raised by a Greek expression
used in [ref003]Hebrews 11:11.
Another exchange on this subject begins on page 9 of this issue. In his
original rebuttal, Lockwood urged the editor "to open the scope of
his paper to defend his ONLY recourse after he rejects the
Bible--agnosticism." "Let his readers see," Lockwood
continued, "what he offers in return."
To say the least, we found this to be a perplexing statement. Why, for
example, would agnosticism be the only recourse to someone who rejects the
Bible? Couldn't one reject the Bible to embrace the Koran or the Avesta
or Buddhism or New Age philosophy? We won't deny that agnosticism is an
appropriate and logical alternative to the Bible, but it is certainly not
the ONLY recourse that one has after rejecting the Bible. Apparently, Mr.
Lockwood didn't think this statement through before he passed it along to
The intent of the statement, however, was to challenge us to defend
agnosticism by offering our readers something to replace what we urge them
to abandon, and he is not the first to present this challenge. Many others
have written to say that we have a duty to offer our readers a better
alternative than belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible. The
challenge implies that the iconoclast has some kind of moral
responsibility to formulate an alternative philosophical system that is
superior to the one that he has proven false.
What these critics and challengers don't seem to understand is that the
exposure of error inherently leaves a superior alternative in its wake.
That superior alternative is truth, because it is always better to be
right than wrong, to believe a truth than to believe a falsehood. On this
and related issues, H. L. Mencken. the American critic and satirist, once
I believe that religion, generally speaking, has been a curse
to mankind--that its modest and greatly overestimated services on
the ethical side have been more than overborne by the damage it
has done to clear and honest thinking.
I believe that no discovery of fact, however trivial, can be
wholly useless to the human race, and that no trumpeting of
falsehood, however virtuous in intent, can be anything but
I believe that the evidence for immortality is no better than
the evidence for witches, and deserves no more respect.... I
believe in complete freedom of thought and speech, alike for the
humblest to the mightiest, and in the utmost freedom of conduct
that is consistent with living in an organized society.
But the whole thing, after all, may be put very simply. I
believe that it is better to tell the truth than to lie. I believe
that it is better to be free than to be a slave. And I believe
that it is better to know than to be ignorant.
The transcendentalist poet Ralph Waldo Emerson said in his poem
"The Rhodora" that "if eyes were made for seeing then
beauty is its own excuse for being." We believe that the same
principle applies to truth. The truth needs nothing to justify it
existence. Although falsehood may be infinitely more appealing and
comforting than the truth, falsehood is never better than truth.
We believe, then, that we have met Mr. Lockwood's challenge. We have
told him and our other readers the truth about the Bible, and no matter
how destructive to cherished beliefs that truth may be, it is far better
than the falsehood that deludes people into believing that the Bible is a
divine book that was given to guide man into an eternal paradise. After
all, what could be more cruel than to live a life of expectation only to
have that expectation prove false? The fact that the expecter may never
know that the expectation was false changes nothing. He still lived a
life that was based on lies. How could that possibly be better than the
FREE SUBSCRIPTION: A free one-year subscription to _The_Skeptical_
Review_ can be obtained by emailing [ref004]Jftill@aol.com or by writing to P.O. Box
717, Canton, IL 61520-0717.
File contributed by [ref005]Farrell Till; page
maintained by the [ref006]Internet Infidels.
[ref010]Copyright © 1995 [ref011]Internet Infidels.
HTML Reproduction Rights Reserved.