Article 3042 of misc.activism.progressive Subject Pentagon's plans for NWO Followup-To alt

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Article 3042 of misc.activism.progressive: Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive From: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel) Subject: Pentagon's plans for NWO Message-ID: <1992Mar24.202157.5489@mont.cs.missouri.edu> Followup-To: alt.activism.d Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu Organization: PACH Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1992 20:21:57 GMT Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu Lines: 123 /** Christic.news: 100.0 **/ ** Topic: DOD'S U.S. SUPERPOWER PLAN ** ** Written 5:42 am Mar 15, 1992 by Christic in cdp:christic.news ** From: Christic Institute Subject: DOD'S U.S. SUPERPOWER PLAN /* Written 6:04 pm Mar 14, 1992 by newsdesk in cdp:ips.englibrary */ /* ---------- "UNITED STATES: DISAVOWALS OF PENTAG" ---------- */ Copyright Inter Press Service 1992, all rights reserved. Permission to re- print within 7 days of original date only with permission from 'newsdesk'. Title: UNITED STATES: DISAVOWALS OF PENTAGON DOCUMENT UNCONVINCING An Inter Press Service Feature by Jim Lobe Washington, Mar 11 (IPS) -- Despite disavowals by senior officials of a secret Pentagon document outlining a long-term U.S. strategy to preserve its global ''preeminence,'' many analysts here believe its basic thrust represents the majority view within the administration of President George Bush. Bush insisted Wednesday that he was unaware of the document, excerpts of which were published in the New York Times Sunday. Bush also insisted that Washington remained committed to ''working closely with multilateral organisations.'' ''We are the leaders (of the world) and we must continue to lead,'' the President said. Washington's global role, he said, should not be treated as a ''Clear-cut choice of either-or'' between collective security and unilateral action, which appeared to be very much the approach of the document. Basic thrust of the document was that U.S. policy for the foreseeable future should be designed to prevent the emergence of any new global superpower and to maintain Washington's ability to act unilaterally against what it sees as threats to its interests and those of its allies around the world. ''While the U.S. cannot become the world's 'policeman,' by assuming responsibility for righting every wrong, we will retain the pre-eminent responsibility for addressing selectively those wrongs which threaten not only our interests, but those of our allies, or friends, or which could seriously unsettle international relations,'' read the document. Such wrongs justifying unilateral action include ''access to vital raw materials,'' especially gulf oil, ''proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles, threats to U.S. citizens from terrorism or local conflict, and threats to U.S. society from narcotics trafficking.'' The document -- whose drafting was supervised by Paul Wolfowitz, the number-three man in the Pentagon -- called for coopting ''potential competitors'' from the West and notes with satisfaction that recent events have promoted ''the integration of Germany and Japan into a U.S.-led system of collective security.'' Washington should ''prevent the emergence of European-only security arrangements that would undermine (the U.S.-led) Nato,'' discourage Japan from extending its military power, and ''discourage Indian hegemonic aspirations'' in South Asia and the Indian Ocean. (more/IPS) United States: Disavowals (2) Publication of the report set off a flurry of reactions among foreign-policy specialists and foreign diplomats and reporters here who wanted to know first whether this was official -- albeit secret -- U.S. policy. Clearly embarassed, the State Department stressed that it was a ''low-level document'' in which it had no input. and the visiting Indian Foreign Secretary was assured by deputy secretary of state Lawrence Eagleburger the paper had no standing. At the same time, senior officials told lawmakers and journalists privately that the paper was ''dead on arrival,'' ''dumb,'' ''hopelessly naive,'' and nothing more than the Pentagon's latest attempt to ward off more cuts to its projected five-year 1.3 trillion dollar budget. But Pentagon spokesperson Pete Williams, while insisting it was only a ''draft'' that had not been cleared at senior levels, admitted that he was ''puzzled'' by the off-the-record comments. ''A great deal of what was reported Sunday (in the Times) is consistent with what the Secretary (of Defense Dick Cheney) and the chairman (of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Colin Powell) have been testifying on before Congress,'' said Williams. He also stressed that Washington ''Is not looking for a unilateral role in the world,'' adding that ''We want to stay involved with our alliances (and) remain part of a community of nations.'' But that, too, is not inconsistent with the document, which insisted nonetheless that Washington should retains its ability to act independently in its own interests. Independent analysts also saw something more than a trial balloon floated by a bureaucracy imperilled by budget cuts. ''This is an overt attempt to preserve very stark U.S. superiority, and that is going to raise fears of American hegemony all over the world,'' said John Steinbruner, foreign-policy director at the influential Brookings Institution. Democratic senator Joseph Biden also assailed the document as a recipe for ''a Pax Americana,'' while another senior senator, Robert Byrd said it as ''myopic, shallow, and disappointing.'' Long-time National-Security expert Richard Barnet of the Institute of Policy Studies here said the document depicted a ''Dangerous dream world in which the U.S. will literally be world policeman, and everyone would be happy about that.'' His description, however, recalled the words of Bush himself in his 'State of the Union address' six weeks ago, when he noted that the ''World ...now recognises one sole and pre-eminent power: the United States of America. and they regard this with no dread. for the world trusts us with power. ...they trust us to do what's right. (end/IPS/jl/lp) ** End of text from cdp:Christic.news **

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank