Study finds evidence of ESP phenomenon By David L. Chandler, Globe staff from +quot;AAAS i

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Study finds evidence of ESP phenomenon By David L. Chandler, Globe staff from "AAAS in Boston," in the Boston Globe, 15 February 1993 A psychologist from Cornell University reported yesterday what he said was the best evidence yet for the existence of a form of ESP, or extrasensory perception, gathered from a detailed new analysis of 39 studies that were done in the 1970s and 1980s. While a person in one room stared at a picture or video clips of anything from a Bugs Bunny cartoon to a crashing tidal wave, another person in a room isolated from the first described whatever popped into his or her mind. Far more often than could be explained by chance, the "receiver" described images very similar to what the "sender" was watching, said psychologist Daryl J. Bem of Cornell University, who was a coauthor of the study. Surveys have shown that most people believe in the likelihood of some ESP phenomena -- such as telepathy, or reading the thoughts of another person; clairvoyance, or "seeing" something in a distant place; or precognition, which is knowing something before it happens -- are real. Even among natural scientists, one survey showed 55 percent think the reality of some ESP experiences is established or likely. But among psychologists, only 34 percent think so, and research on the subject is almost never reported in mainstream psychological journals. In an unusual departure from that trend, the analysis of the experiments has been accepted for publication by the American Psychological Bulletin, which Robert Rosenthal, chairman of the psychology department at Harvard University, describes as "the most prestigious journal in psychology." Results of earlier experiments that claimed to show evidence for ESP have often been only slightly above the level of chance, but in the latest analysis "the probability that the results could have occurred by chance is less than 1 in a billion," says Bem, who presented the results in Boston at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Bem, a coauthor of the study with Charles Honorton, who was a parapsychologist at the University of Edinburgh [sic]. Honorton died last November. Rosenthal said in an interview he was "quite persuaded" by Bem's results. He had been "an agnostic" about the existence of ESP, he said, but "the statistical evidence [in Bem's analysis] is quite clear to me that there is a phenomenon there that does require explaining." In the experiments Bem studied, a sender in one room focused on a photograph, art reproduction, or video segment that had been randomly selected by a computer, while a receiver sat in another room with his eyes covered with Ping-Pong ball halves and earphones blocking any sounds with a steady "white noise." The receiver then described his or her mental impressions during the time the sender was viewing the image. The setup was designed to isolate the receiver from any ordinary sights, sounds, or sensations on the theory that ESP impressions may be so faint that they are easily swamped by the ordinary sights and sounds. Also, the images used for the experiment were chosen to be more interesting than the simple geometrical symbols often used in many earlier ESP experiments. Subjects often became bored and did not do well. Later, the receiver was shown four or more different images, including the one the sender had been looking at and asked to pick the one that most clearly matched what they experienced during the test period. With four choices, the subject had a 25 percent chance of choosing the correct one. "Strong Evidence" But in a total of 330 tests, the overall "hit" rate was 32 percent -- "the largest effect we know of," Bem said -- in any experiment on ESP. It is a rate that Donald B. Rubin, chairman of the department of statistics at Harvard, said yesterday would provide "strong evidence that the effect is real," assuming that the experimental procedures were valid. Two psychologists performed independent reviews in 1985 of a similar set of experiments, to assess any possible flaws in the methods used. They concluded at the time that the statistical effect in those tests was overwhelming, but disagreed on the possibility of flaws in the procedures. They then jointly signed a statement suggesting how the procedures could be tightened to make the results clearly valid. One of those researchers was Honorton, who went on to set up experiments specifically designed to overcome every criticism that had been leveled at the earlier experiments. Bem, who performs magic acts in his spare time, was brought in to check the procedures to guard against any possibility of fraud or inadvertent communication. Magicians are often used to check experiments in ESP as a safeguard against trickery. Creative edge noted In the most recent experiments, Bem also found evidence to support the widely held belief that creative people are more receptive to ESP. Twenty students from the Juilliard School of Music participated in the experiment, and their results were even more striking than those of other subjects. Compared to the 25 percent chance rate, the students scored 50 percent. And the musicians in that group did even better -- a 75 percent hit rate. Ray Hyman, a psychologist at the university of Oregon who wrote the critical review of these experiments in 1985, remains skeptical, Bem said. But Rosenthal, who was called in by a professional journal to referee the debate between Hyman and Honorton in 1985, said "the numbers are so clear now that it's really incumbent on the critics to try to explain these and make them go away." Rosenthal said that one of the things that makes the new study especially credible is that Bem "is one of the true agnostics in the field, who came to it without preconceived ideas" of whether the phenomenon was real. "He had the right background," Rosenthal said. Bem said the safeguards used in the recent experiments as a result of the 1985 critique "rule out, for me, all other reasonable nonpsi explanations that have been suggested." Psi is another term for ESP phenomena. Bem is conducting another set of such experiments to add to the body of evidence on the subject. The latest results are clear enough, Rosenthal said, that "I think it'll make it a little more socially acceptable to do such research."


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank