From braintree!news.sprintlink.net!news.zeitgeist.net!news.c2.org!news.c2.org!not-for-mail Tue Oct 31 10:53:56 1995
From: email@example.com (Syrinx Anonymous Remailer)
Subject: Scientology Justice
Date: 29 Oct 1995 21:31:14 -0800
Organization: Community ConneXion: http://www.c2.org 510-658-6376
Comments: Please report misuse of this automated remailing service to
Here is an example of what Scientology considers justice. This is my
I left the Cult about 1987, and was still rather supportive of people
who were in it. My disagreement was with the prices, not with the Tech
per-se, though I did think Scientologists were too serious about it.
Because they are so serious about it, less than 1% of all the auditors
ever trained are still auditing. It's just too dangerous to audit, one
mistake and they can take away your certificates. That's one result of
Scientology "justice" by the way, NO AUDITORS, but that's another
So I leave the cult, privately, without making a big stink, but I did
go about and talk to lots of ex-members.
Now remember, all this time, I'm still supportive of cult members. It
isn't mine to judge them for give them a hard time.
Then one day someone posts the "Scientology Enemies List" on the
Internet and there's my name!
I was not informed about this, I was never officially notified, I
never received any letter, nothing! I was never able to confront my
accusers nor did I have any kind of "hearing". Suddenly I am now fair
game with Scientology telling its members that it is OK to do anything
up to killing and injuring me. Probably some ethics officer got a
report from someone and decided to declare me a Suppressive Person. So
Actually, even if I had demanded a "Comm Ev" that would have been just
another "Bend Over Here it Comes Again" from Scientology and my pride
level and self esteem had risen greatly since I'd left. A "Committee
of Evidence" is a Scientology Kangaroo Court where the upper
executives tell the board members to "get that son of a bitch on the
RPF" and then the board members manufacture evidence to justify that
decision. They probably don't even have Committees of Evidence
anymore, at least not in the Sea Org.
That is the kind of "justice" you can expect in a Scientology
world. Scientology's policy is to "shoot first, ask questions
later". They had better look around because all of the people who got
"shot" between 1980 and now are waiting to tear it apart limb from
limb. How does Scientology expect someone to react when a large
multi-national corporation singles them out for "fair game" treatment?
Anything anyone does against Scientology is probably justifiable as
Scientology thinks it knows why it has enemies, but it doesn't know
squat. By its own rules, if it knew the truth it would AS-IS and the
enemies would not exist.
It has enemies because it makes them by its own internal
injustice. And that's the truth.