From braintree!news.sprintlink.net!news.uoregon.edu!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!uwm.edu!usenet Thu Oct 12 16:54:43 1995
From: Dick Cleek
Subject: The Copyright Act lists four factors for consideration in determining whether a particular use made of a work is fair use:
Date: 11 Oct 1995 15:25:18 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin Centers
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <45e6g4$qkk_001@DIAL.NET.NYU.EDU> <email@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2 (Windows; U; 16bit)
Xref: braintree alt.religion.scientology:115452 comp.org.eff.talk:64991
firstname.lastname@example.org (Brian Thurston) wrote:
>Fair play may not be what you think it is. Perhaps you shouls
>familiarize yourself with the latest opinions before making you
You probably meant to say fair use...and since you're a Scientologist
I presume that this was not a Freudian "fair game" mistake.
>You may not understand the _legal_ concept of _fair usage_.
Why don't you read it? And here it is:
Under this limitation, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . .
scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."
17 U.S.C.A. § 107.
The Copyright Act lists four factors for consideration in
determining whether a particular use made of a work is fair use:
1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is
of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to
the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the
Why don't you just get back to us when you've had a chance to digest
the whole thing.