From braintree!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!nntpgate.primenet.com!nntpdist.primenet.com!cultxpt Tue Oct 10 10:01:10 1995
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Jeff Jacobsen)
Subject: Cooley supports child sacrifice?
Date: 5 Oct 1995 16:20:56 GMT
Organization: Primenet (602)395-1010
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Earle Cooley refuses to look at the OT material out of respect for the
religion of Scientology. In other words, Earl Cooley is respecting
something he has never seen or read. How does Cooley know what he is
respecting? What if the OT material promotes child sacrifice? would he
support it then (it doesn't, BTW)? How does Andrew Milne stand up for a
religion that he (I assume) has never even seen it's main teachings?
Perhaps he is standing up for a church that promotes the overthrow of the
US (it doesn't, BTW)? How does the IRS give tax exempt status to a group
that may be teaching revolt against the United States?
Meanwhile, the secret ceremonies of the Mormon church are accessible
through ex-Mormons and critics, yet the Mormon church essentially ignores
this. Do you know how to get these? I thought not. Scientology
attacks, sues, and harasses those that expose their upper teachings. Do
you know how to get these? I thought so. Is there a lesson in this
comparison? I think so.
Jeff Jacobsen SP3, Scientology critic
PO Box 3541 ftp.primenet.com /users/c/cultxpt
Scottsdale AZ 85271 http://www.skeptic.com/03.3.jl-jj-scientology.html
USA Scientology has raided 4 critics' homes!!!