Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews Wed Jul 19 09:29:20 1995 Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: esi_inc@ix.netcom.com (Tim Johnson) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,misc.legal,misc.legal.computing,misc.taxes,comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: The Noose is Tightening on CoS (was Big Suprise - 79K) (LONG) Date: 19 Jul 1995 00:42:49 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 34 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3uhke9$gri@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> References: <3u8enc$e34@castlsys.demon.co.uk> <19950718.001310.70@holsoft.demon.co.uk> <3uf5mk$3nj@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-chi4-15.ix.netcom.com Xref: news.interserv.net alt.religion.scientology:76718 misc.legal:62441 misc.legal.computing:10310 misc.taxes:18965 comp.org.eff.talk:57202 In visnet@onramp.net (Sri Changiana Saar) writes: > >In article <3uf5mk$3nj@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>, esi_inc@ix.netcom.com (Tim >Johnson) wrote: > >> Dear Sister Clara > >Pardon me for jumping in even though I'm not, technically, Sis Clara... So, as quick as someone might speak out and say, “Hey, I’m a Scientologist and this is my point of view,” he would get vehemently and viciously attacked religiously and personally from many sides; issue taken with each paragraph - and all of the above based on... second and third hand information as I said; allegations, claims, reports of apparently incriminating court records (much of such inflammatory information is the result of Mr. Erlich’s activities, who was thrown out of the Church for theft and Squirelling - that is, altering the technology). Of course, someone will dutifully take exception to all these statements, again. The rancor with which this occurs is my evidence. So blast away. The responses would have me in an endless debate on every minor point, yet they all avoided the major premise completely. So I'll be more succinct: What do you know to be fact, personally, yourself, with firsthand knowledge - what do you *actually* know about the CoS? Answer that.

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank