Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From!!!ncar!noao!!merrill Wed Jul 19 09:29:14 1995 Path:!!!ncar!noao!!merrill From: (Clark Merrill) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,,,misc.taxes, Subject: Re: The Noose is Tightening on CoS (was Big Suprise - 79K) (LONG) Date: 18 Jul 1995 09:43 EST Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute Lines: 111 Distribution: world Message-ID: <> References: <3u8enc$> <3uf5mk$> NNTP-Posting-Host: Summary: This is about the COS attacking other people! News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.50 Xref: alt.religion.scientology:76569 misc.taxes:18939 In article <3uf5mk$>, (Tim Johnson) writes... > >> Deleting LOTS of stuff! > >Dear Sister Clara > >Being a Scientologist myself doesnít mean that I believe in Scn or L. >Ron Hubbard, and I donít know of any others frankly who do believe >something as if in a cult or a faith even. What I consider about the >CoS is based on what information I have read, studied, examined, tested >and evaluated for myself - not the claims of others, not the reports >(purported false or otherwise), but what I have experienced to be true >for myself. > I am glad it works for you. But whether it works or not has nothing to do with this whole debate! Cutting more. I do not consider myself to be "blind or intolerant" when it comes to COS. I would not even know of it's existance if it were not for the actions of COS against people who ARE NOT members. That for me is the key to this whole thing. They are attacking people through lawsuits and intimidation who have no present connection to the COS. They are also attacking the institutions of the Internet because they promote FREE speech. The COS is incredibly intolerant of free speech. You see, I don't care what they do to members of their church, but when they begin to engage in barratry in order to silence critics, it gets me VERY upset. When someone tries to remove a newgroup because they don't like what it says, it has the same effect. Read the following WEB page and look at how little of it actually attacks the religious practices of COS. The WEB page is about COS attacking other people! You see because the the actions of COS in the last six monthes I have become convinced that "FAIR GAME" is still the policy of COS. Hopefully losing the Erlich suit will rob them of their ability to attack the Internet. I guess it is time to donate another $50 to the Erlich defense fund. Please I welcome all members of COS to read Ron's page. In reading the page you will begin to notice that the actions of the church again it's critics are what began this mess, not the religion itself! So if your church never attacked people who were not members, none of this would of happenned. Just my thoughts! How to donate to the Erlich defense fund follows sig. Clark Merrill I speak for myself and noone else!! Baltimore, Maryland From Ron's home page: As you have probably heard, Dennis Erlich, an outspoken critic of the Church of Scientology (CoS) and a regular poster to alt.religion.scientology, has been sued by two organizations associated with CoS. While the prominent San Francisco law firm of Morrison and Foerster is graciously providing pro bono legal services for Dennis Erlich's defense, the hard expenses (such as telephone bills, airline tickets, copying, etc.) associated with a case like this will run into the tens of thousands before the case is through. The Dennis Erlich Defense Fund has been established to help Dennis pay these legal expenses. Please help. We must fight against this threat to free speech on the net. Send your contribution to: MORRISON & FOERSTER 345 California Street San Francisco, California 94104-2675 Telephone: (415) 677-7000 Facsimile: (415) 677-7522 Contact People: Carla Oakley and Katie Walsh MAKE SURE YOU LABEL YOUR CHECK "DENNIS ERLICH DEFENSE FUND". If you're outside the U.S., you may mail a check drawn on a foreign bank (even in non-US currency), or you may send money to the Fund via wire transfer: Credit to: Morrison and Foerster -- IOLTA for Dennis Erlich Defense Fund Citibank, F.S.B. Attn: The Citibank Private Bank (legal) One Sansome Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Account No. 2300115075 ABA No. 321171184 For more information on the Erlich case, read these Web pages: ------------- From: Date: Sun, 30 Apr 95 08:03:10 -0700 Any funds left in the Dennis Erlich Defense Fund when the case is over will, of course, go into EFF general treasury, along with any of the costs the court orders paid that EFF has given to MoFo to cover costs.


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank