Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be
Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95
From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!superdec.uni.uiuc.edu!tskirvin Wed Jul 19 09:29:08 1995
From: email@example.com (Tim Skirvin)
Subject: Re: The Noose is Tightening on CoS (was Big Suprise - 79K) (LONG)
Date: 17 Jul 1995 22:50:59 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Xref: news.interserv.net alt.religion.scientology:76432 misc.legal:62284 misc.legal.computing:10279 misc.taxes:18900 comp.org.eff.talk:57090
"R. Urban" writes:
>I do access some of the other newgroups though, and object to your
>obvious hostile attack on religion.
On _a_ religion. The term "religion" being quite loosely
Hell, if you check the group (which this is also posted to, and,
incidentally, followups are set there exclusively), you'll note that most
objections are _not_ based on Scientology in general, they're based on
what Scientology does, what it stands for, and what their goals are.
Few there would dispute the right of a religion to exist; fewer would
advocate destruction of all involved. However, we can -- and do --
despise their actions, criminal or otherwise.
And we also fight against their actions.
[invocation of Godwin's Law deleted]
- Tim Skirvin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Suppressive Person in Training
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank