Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dgsys.com!DGS.dgsys.com!alerma Mon Jul 17 09:49:41 1995 Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.dgsys.com!DGS.dgsys.com!alerma From: alerma@dgsys.com (alerma) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Erlich Case Documents part 2 of 3 Date: 14 Jul 1995 11:59:16 GMT Organization: Digital Gateway Systems Lines: 345 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3u5m6k$3u6@news.dgsys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dgs.dgsys.com Keywords: appendix A X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] EXHIBIT A DOCUMENTS DOCUMENT DEFECTS 1. HCOPL 25 Feb. 1966, * No right to renewal ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY period after Dec. 31, 1994. * No automatic presumption of validity due to (1) lack of renewal registration, and (2) more than 5 years before registration. 2. HCO PL 23 DEC. 1965, * No automatic presumption ETHICS, SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, of validity due to SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, (1) lack of renewal SUPPRESSION OF registration, and SCIENTOLOGY AND (2) more than 5 years SCIENTOLOGISTS, THE FAIR before registration. GAME LAW * No presumption as to corrected information. * Title discrepancy. * No presumption as to corrected information in supplement. * No presumption since in renewal term and no renewal registration. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 3. LRH ED 149 PROJECT * Title discrepancy. SQUIRREL * No registration for underlying work sued upon. * Claim in footnote 1 to Exh. A that this work is confidential is inconsistent with the certificate, which shows work was published and two copies deposited. 4. 20 Nov. 1961, ROUTINE * Copyright expired; work 3D COMMANDS in public domain. * Title discrepancy. * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. * No presumption as to corrected information. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 5. HCO PL 1 JULY 1965 * No right to renewal ETHICS CHITS period after Dec. 31, 1993. * Title discrepancy. * No automatic presumption of validity due to (1) lack of renewal registration, and (2) more than 5 years before registration. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 2 6. HCO B 22 MARCH 1967, * No right to renewal ALTER-IS AND DEGRADED period after Dec. 31, BEINGS 1995. * Title discrepancy. * No automatic presumption of validity due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. * No presumption as to corrected information. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 7. HCO PL 1 May 1965 STAFF * No right to renewal MEMBER REPORTS period after Dec. 31, 1993. * No automatic presumption of validity due to (1) lack of renewal registration, and (2) more than 5 years before registration. * No presumption as to corrected information. * Title discrepancy. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 8. HCO PL 6 December 1976 * Title discrepancy. ILLEGAL PCS, ACCEPTANCE OF * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 9. HCOB 10 September 1983 * Title discrepancy. PTSNESS AND DISCONNECTION * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 10. HCOB 6 May 1982 I THE * Title discrepancy. CAUSE OF CRIME 8 No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. 8 No registration for underlying work sued upon. EXHIBIT B DOCUMENTS DOCUMENT DEFECTS 1. CLASS VIII "ASSISTS" TAPE No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. 2. NOTS ISSUE 24 "NOTS * No registration for CORRECTION LIST" underlying work sued upon. * No presumption as to corrected information. * Title discrepancy. * No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate. 3. OT1 * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 4. OT2 * No presumption due to lapse of more than 5 years before registration. * No registration for underlying work sued upon. 5. NOTS Issue 34 * No registration for underlying work sued upon. * No presumption as to corrected information. * Title discrepancy. * No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate. 6. NOTS Issue 35 * No registration for underlying work sued upon. * Title discrepancy. * No presumption as to corrected information. * No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate. 7. NOTS Issue 36 * No registration for underlying work sued upon. * Title discrepancy. * No presumption as to corrected information. * No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate. 8. NOTS Issue 1 * No registration for underlying work sued upon. * No presumption as to corrected information. * Title discrepancy. * No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate. 9. NOTS Issue 42 * No registration for underlying work sued upon. * No presumption as to corrected information. * Title discrepancy.--- * No grant of special treatment for allegedly confidential works indicated on certificate. CSMGMT U.S. District Court U.S. District for the Northern District of California (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 95-CV-20091 Religious Technology, et al v. Netcom On-Line Comm., et al Filed: 02/08/95 Assigned to: Judge Ronald M. Whyte Jury demand: Defendant Referred to: Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 820 Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal Question Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, a Andrew H. Wilson California non-profit (COR LD NTC] corporation Wilson Ryan Blum & Campilongo Plaintiff 235 Montgomery St Ste 450 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 39 1 - 3 9 0 0 Kendrick L. Moxon [COR LD NTC] Bowles & Moxon 6255 Sunset Blvd Ste 2000 Los Angeles, CA 90028 (213) 661-4030 Thomas M. Small [COR LD NTC] Small Larkin Kidde & Golant 10940 Wilshire Blvd Ste 400 Los Angeles, CA 90024 (310) 209-4400 Helena K. Kobrin [COR LD NTC] 7629 Fulton Avenue North Hollywood, CA 91605 (213) 960-1933 Elliot J. Abelson [COR LD NTC] 2121 Avenue of the Stars Twenty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-5010 310-282-8975 BRIDGE PUBLICATIONS, INC., a Andrew H. Wilson California non-profit (See above) corporation [COR LD NTC] --------- end of part 2 of looks like 4 now, sorry... ---------

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank