Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From!!!pipex!uknet!gdt!bsmail!plmlp Mon Jul 10 16:59:56 1995 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Path:!!!pipex!uknet!gdt!bsmail!plmlp From: (Martin Poulter) Subject: Who is this nutter? Message-ID: Sender: (Usenet news owner) Nntp-Posting-Host: Organization: University of Bristol, England Date: Thu, 6 Jul 1995 14:21:06 GMT Lines: 69 I just received this e-mail. I have had to heavily re-format it in order to post it. Despite his claimed intelligence, the writer doesn't seem to know how to use e-mail software. Who is this guy? Date: Thu, 6 Jul 1995 09:41:49 -0400 From: Message-Id: <> To: Subject: You are spreading false information on the Internet about Scientology. The references you cite are incorrect. But you lead your readers to believe they have researched the subject in a scientific and scholarly manner. How dare you! Your conclusion that Scientology "brainwashes" people is completely false. Just the opposite is true. This is a religion but a science as well. [Sorry, but I've studied science at degree level. A "science" based on no research whatsoever is not a science. If you can prove me wrong with some citations, go ahead.] As with any science or discipline, the correct application of the technology produces uniform and standard results. [It seems to me that the belief system in Scientology is such that "correct application" is defined as that which produces the claimed effects (or at least makes everyone *agree* that those effects have occurred) When the tech goes wrong, that's the fault of the individual's abberations or past crimes.] Those results include the ability to think clearly and independently, a greater awareness about oneself and one's ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[Like Woody or Jack Farmer?] relationship with life and others, a higher degree of ethics (ethics is ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ defined as those actions which promote survival to the greatest number), etc. [Courts around the world disagree.] You are masking false information to promote your agenda against the Church. Why? What crimes have you committed? What are you hiding? What do you hope to gain from this? [Jeez, I don't even need to parody you! I don't even have to tell people that the Scientology belief system is paranoid. People like you do it for me.] Your kind has been around since 1950 when Dianetics was released. Despite the efforts of anti-social personalities like you, Scientology is booming. [Income is declining, number of active orgs is declining; Narconon is shrinking. The figures have been posted on this newsgroup. If you can prove they're wrong, go ahead] I have extensive knowledge of Scientology. My experience totally contradicts your information. [I have been posting some Fair Use extracts of Hubbard's writings. Helena Kobrin has confirmed that the extracts that I used are authentic. Dare you contradict Source?] I am more capable of clear, rational thinking as a result of Scientology. [well maybe you should be giving lessons to the Scientologists who post to a.r.s] Scientology has removed the "brainwashing" I've had. That's why I can be more aware of everything now. It's like climbing up a mountain. The higher you go up the more you can see and be aware of. You are in a cave -- aware of nothing. [Wouldn't a better metaphor than a cave be, ummm... a dark, grimy basement?] -- MARTIN L: Postgrad. studying "Probability and Belief" at Bristol University POULTER : KNIGHT NATASEVOLLLEWYLLOJI WWW Home Page & Scientology Critics' OF Scientology is a dangerous cult stuff: XENU -warn your family and friends.


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank