Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From!!!pipex!demon!not-for-mail Mon Jul 10 17:02:39 1995 Path:!!!pipex!demon!not-for-mail From: Koos Nolst Trenite Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: RI-230i Validating Pretended Rightness Date: Sat, 8 Jul 95 14:29:48 +0200 Lines: 123 Message-ID: <> Reply-To: X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 8 July 1995 RI-230i 'Validating Pretended Rightness' from Ron's Inspector Message # RI-230i for Internet Validating pretended rightness is about validating things which a psychotic or suppressive does right. The point is that psychotics and suppressives do certain things right and demand validation of having done these things right IN ORDER TO COVER UP that they want to be and remain psychotic or suppressive. So, what you are actually validating then, is their successfully executed intention to cover up that they actually only want to destroy and suppress. But if you don't validate them, they will heavily accuse you and they will try to make others accuse you, of "not validating their rightness," of "not validating things they did right." This is a common accusation coming from a Suppressive to you. In actual fact, if you care to look, HE never validates the rightness of others, but he does validate the pretended rightness of suppressives. In other words, if you do not validate a suppressive or a psychotic - for the good works he does in order to cover up his destructiveness and suppressiveness - then the suppressive or psychotic will accuse you of suppressing him. This is quite a severe problem in handling suppressives or psychotics: what does he do right which is ACTUALLY right? HE certainly does not know that, otherwise he wouldn't be a psychotic. So you have to figure this out for him and then indicate it to him, and he will be quite surprised: "Gosh, THAT is survival? I never thought it would be!" Normal people do good works and should be validated. Psychotics and suppressives do good works solely in order to cover up their destructive and suppressive actions. These should NOT be validated, as they are not really good works at all, and these 'good works' are done solely to create more evil and suppression in that area or in other areas. Good works done by decent people, and good works done by suppressives or psychotics are NOT the same thing. One must be validated, the other must not be validated, as you would in fact be validating suppression. Even the suppressive who 'cares for his son', does so in order to prevent the son from finding out that his father is a suppressive, and THEREBY harms the son much more than if he would openly not care for the son. Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite references: RI-0i 'Current Ethics' of 30 June 1994 RI-10i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994 RI-19i 'Artists and Ethics' of 10 Sep 1992 RI-24i 'Definition of 'PTS' - IMPORTANT' of 19 Nov 1994 RI-53i 'Past Life Criminals and Scn Ethics' of 29 Jul 1994 RI-61i 'The Right to be Evil' of 16 Dec 1994 RI-123i 'Use of the "Suppressive Person"-concept' 25 Mar 1995 RI-134i 'The Suppressive Person who "is now Good"' 21 Aug 94 RI-196i 'Slaves who will Never be Free' of 2 Jun 1995 RI-201i 'The Perverters of Beauty and Life' of 4 Jun 1995 RI-204i 'Protecting Suppressive Persons' of 5 Jun 1995 RI-ACT-14 'A Note to CB Willis on Suppressives' 9 Nov 1994 RI-ACT-24R 'KNT-Tech for SP's (Revised)' of 29 Nov 1994 RI-ACT-40 'Validating Suppressives' of 14 Jan 1995 RI-ACT-73 'Condemnation' of 22 Apr 1995 RI-ACT-74 'Awareness of Who Did It' of 25 Apr 1995 RI-50R-Mi 'Archives of RI-xxi and RI-ACT-xx series' of 28 Dec 1994, Revised and Replaced 21 May 1995 ftp:


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank