Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95
From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.nyc.pipeline.com!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!cmcl2!is2.NYU.EDU!spurgeon Mon Jul 10 17:02:21 1995
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Keith Spurgeon)
Subject: Re: Chris Miller: Lay it to Rest
Date: 8 Jul 1995 23:19:33 GMT
Organization: New York University
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3t4jl7$iqd@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3tl0v6$5mc@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Chris Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
: email@example.com (Keith Spurgeon) wrote:
: > As I have said elsewhere in this group, I didn't care a bit about
: >Co$ until they started cancelling messages,
: Messages which were illegally copying information were cancelled. So
: you codone illegal actions, eh?
Who is the individual who did the cancellation, if it was legal and
justified? Why don't they stand up and take credit?
I do not condone copyright infringement. That has not been proven.
Neither do I condone unauthorized forged cancel messages. I have seen
evidence of that with my own eyes.
Several of the messages recently cancelled were reposted. At least one
of these included only a couple of paragraphs of Co$ material with
several paragraphs of commentary. This cancel cannot be justified, if
unauthorized forged cancels ever are (and I doubt that).
: > While a full answer, with explanations, may not raise your
: >credibility, it is your only chance to do so.
: I don't seek credibility from someone who supports illegal activities.
You are the one directly supporting illegal activities. I am against
unauthorized forged cancel messages.
I have not been repeatedly demonstrated as a prevaricator in this group.
I am not one of the rabid flamers (though I enjoy some of them).
I have tried to be rational and get answers from you about your smear of
Morrison and Foerster.
Chris Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org) is a member of the Church of
Scientology, which is engaged in litigation against Dennis Ehrlich.
Ehrlich is represented by Morrison and Foerster (MoFo) on a pro bono
basis. Chris Miller (email@example.com posted a message to soc.women
claiming that s/he had a daughter who had been hired by MoFo. S/he made
unsubstantiated allegations about MoFo and claimed that s/he was therefore
concerned about his/her daughter's well-being. When questioned about this
post on alt.rec.scientology, Chris Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org) produced
no evidence for his/her allegations agains MoFo and claimed that some
details in the post had been changed to disguise his/her identity.
After many weeks of Miller's unresponsiveness to the questions posted on
alt.rec.scientology, many have come to believe the post to soc.women was
a fishing expedition to dig up information that can be used in a dirty
tricks campaign against MoFo.
I'm one of them.