Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- From!!!!!!uunet!!!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!cmcl2!is2.NYU.EDU!spurgeon Mon Jul 10 17:02:21 1995 Path:!!!!!!uunet!!!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!cmcl2!is2.NYU.EDU!spurgeon From: (Keith Spurgeon) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Chris Miller: Lay it to Rest Date: 8 Jul 1995 23:19:33 GMT Organization: New York University Lines: 53 Message-ID: <3tn3q5$7q4@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> References: <3rnr2r$> <3sknu0$> <3sq0v4$> <3t4jl7$iqd@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <3timai$> <3tl0v6$5mc@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <3tmpn0$> NNTP-Posting-Host: X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Chris Miller ( wrote: : (Keith Spurgeon) wrote: : > As I have said elsewhere in this group, I didn't care a bit about : >Co$ until they started cancelling messages, : Messages which were illegally copying information were cancelled. So : you codone illegal actions, eh? Who is the individual who did the cancellation, if it was legal and justified? Why don't they stand up and take credit? I do not condone copyright infringement. That has not been proven. Neither do I condone unauthorized forged cancel messages. I have seen evidence of that with my own eyes. Several of the messages recently cancelled were reposted. At least one of these included only a couple of paragraphs of Co$ material with several paragraphs of commentary. This cancel cannot be justified, if unauthorized forged cancels ever are (and I doubt that). : > While a full answer, with explanations, may not raise your : >credibility, it is your only chance to do so. : I don't seek credibility from someone who supports illegal activities. You are the one directly supporting illegal activities. I am against unauthorized forged cancel messages. I have not been repeatedly demonstrated as a prevaricator in this group. I am not one of the rabid flamers (though I enjoy some of them). I have tried to be rational and get answers from you about your smear of Morrison and Foerster. Chris Miller ( is a member of the Church of Scientology, which is engaged in litigation against Dennis Ehrlich. Ehrlich is represented by Morrison and Foerster (MoFo) on a pro bono basis. Chris Miller ( posted a message to soc.women claiming that s/he had a daughter who had been hired by MoFo. S/he made unsubstantiated allegations about MoFo and claimed that s/he was therefore concerned about his/her daughter's well-being. When questioned about this post on alt.rec.scientology, Chris Miller ( produced no evidence for his/her allegations agains MoFo and claimed that some details in the post had been changed to disguise his/her identity. After many weeks of Miller's unresponsiveness to the questions posted on alt.rec.scientology, many have come to believe the post to soc.women was a fishing expedition to dig up information that can be used in a dirty tricks campaign against MoFo. I'm one of them. keith


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank