Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95
From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!nntp.et.byu.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!news.dtc.hp.com!hplextra!hplb!sjmz Mon Jul 10 17:02:03 1995
From: email@example.com (Stefek Zaba)
Subject: Re: Scientology Strikes Martin Poulter!
Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org (Usenet News Administrator)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:07:39 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, England
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL0.7]
Xref: news.interserv.net alt.religion.scientology:74329 news.admin.misc:35673
In alt.support.ex-cult, Modemac (email@example.com) wrote:
> This is a forwarded mail from Martin Poulter...his access has been
> suspended and he's posting from a friend's account.
Fortunately this was a temporary, one-day suspension, while the Univ.
brought its own legal types in to look at the claims. This forum
(alt.support.ex-cult) will, in the main, have opinions already on the
validity of a "copyright infringement" claim from Scientologists, but
I think it quite reasonable that the Univ's *initial* reaction was to
suspend the pages, as if it had been a "Warez" site (i.e. offering
copyrighted software), do a preliminary investigation, and put the
pages back on-air within a day.
For full text, see Martin's article in alt.religion.scientology,
subject "Martin Poulter Strikes Scientology...?", Message-ID:
, posted Sat, 8 Jul 1995 18:29:27 GMT, which
> As it turned out, my account and Web page were only suspended for *one day*!
> My Web page is *not*, repeat *not* deactivated- read it!