Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies. I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report. - Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95
From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!news.igc.apc.org!cdp!zthomas Mon Jul 10 17:02:00 1995
From: Zane Thomas
Subject: Re: Scientology Strikes Martin Poulter!
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 1995 14:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Seems to me that Martin now has grounds to sue. They have acted to
deny him access to the internet, and it apears that they have said some
untrue things about him, especially that he has "violated copyrights."
The post which was recently the object of many cancels and much
reposting had only very short excerpts of the cults offical droppings.
By their actions the cult has essentially "tried and executed" Martin
for posting fair use criticism of the Droppings.
Ok, legal minds. Opinions?