A Discussion of Psychic Powers and How to Develop Them by Don DeGracia, 1993 contact the a

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

A Discussion of Psychic Powers and How to Develop Them by Don DeGracia, 1993 contact the author by CompuServe e-mail at 71331,3517 if you have comments or questions. Note: this was originally an e-mail conversation. I've decided to release it as a text file into cyberspace with the hopes that people interested in occult and psychic phenomena can come to appreciate that there is a very real practicality to understanding the nature of psychic abilities, and as well, maybe the pointers given below can help clear up questions or confusion that beginners into occultism may have. Questioner: < something which you haven't mentioned is that scientists quite often mistake their models as being reality> Answer: I think this is an even more general problem than just scientists taking their models too literally. This is a problem with our culture as a whole. On the whole, our society has a feeble grasp of the nature of the mind, on the relationship between thought and mind, and on the nature of symbolic communication. What's going on generally speaking is a process of "projection". People imagine images in their mind, and then they project an emotional blanket around these images, emotions such as belief, seriousness, literalness. They substitute mental images for reality and fail to realize they have done so. This is a very common delusion in our culture; a person's life experience is one thing, but how they view their life, or more precisely, how they project emotions onto the images in their mind of their experience, is another. I send you that Manly Hall quote a while back where he said something to the effect that a man can spend his life telling us about the forces of Nature or great mathematical truths, yet have poor health, wayward children, a bad marriage, etc. These are the consequences of not clearly delineating in one's own mind the difference between one's actual experience and one's mental images of that experience. The mind is like an echo, or a mirror, nested within our actual experience of being. Again, it's common in our culture that people give greater priority to the echo, or reflection than they do to the real thing. Since this aberrant mental behavior is so wide-spread in our society, it no surprise scientists do it too. At any rate, the point is, people don't recognize the difference between experience and mental images that are but an echo of experience. This relates directly to what you said: Questioner: Answer See, our mental images are objective things, just like a rock or a planet. In the broadest sense, there is no such thing as subjective reality. What we call "subjectivity" is a vague reference to thought and emotion. Our thoughts and our emotions are just as real, often *more* real than the objects of the physical world. When you say < subjective reality and objective reality need to be clearly delineated> what you are really saying is that people have to learn to distinguish between the images in their mind, the emotions they associate with these images, and their literal experience as a creature in the physical world. The mental image is one thing (technically speaking, its a thing called a "thought-form" and I will henceforth use this term), the emotional overtones or content of the thought-form are an altogether separate thing, and the source - often ones direct and literal experience (again, thought is an echo of experience) - that generates the thought-form and associated emotions is a third thing. All three of these things are objective realities. It's actually a matter of etiquette, or psychological hygiene, to know how to distinguish each of these three things and treat each accordingly. The second part of your statement < because what i communicate about my subjectivereality may not translate into another person's subjective reality> ... This isn't any inherent problem in the sense of a limit to subjectivity. This is a result of the fact that people do not understand the workings of their own psychology. It is perfectly possible, and as a matter of fact, is the natural and healthy state of psychological creatures such as ourselves, that you could perfectly transfer your "subjective reality" to my mind. Here, follow this logic: Again, Dear reader, try to conceive of thoughts and emotions as objective things. Think of thoughts as objects that exist in a space that is invisible to our physical senses, and do likewise with emotion. Think of each, thought and emotion, as something like sound waves rippling through a space that you cannot see, hear, taste, touch or smell. Imagine there are two spaces: one for thought and one for emotion. Now, the process of you thinking a thought or feeling an emotion (i.e. you being "subjective") is a process of sending or emitting ripple patterns into these spaces. Now, our mind and our emotions are both generators and detectors of these ripple patterns. Though these ripple patterns in the emotional and mental spaces are invisible to our physical senses, they are not invisible to our mind or our emotions. It is perfectly possible that I could detect to 100% identity the mental and emotional ripples you emit. Again, this doesn't happen in our society because our society as a whole is completely unaware of the processes I am describing to you. See, this gets down to social values and the ideas that fill people's minds. Our society as a whole believes in a number of things, which means they create an image in this mental space and blanket it with ripples from the emotional space, and these are images about such things as ego, mind, privacy, subjectivity, personal identity. All of these imgaes, these thought-forms, form a cloud around the person's mind. All of these thought-forms serve as resistors or filters over the detection capabilities of the mind. They selectively filter out incoming mental and emotional resonances. Again, its actually a matter of etiquette when it comes right down to it. Its *polite* for me to suspend my own generation of thought and emotion and put my mind on 100% detection when you speak so I can as fully as possible resonate with the thought-forms and emotions you are generating towards me. However, this "etiquette" is not shared on a society wide level, and people only see and hear each other through the cloud of thoughts and emotions emitting out of them. Thus, more often than not, the person being communicated to only sees his/her own mental resonances instead of seeing the mental/emotional resonances being emitted by the 2nd person. Or more precisely, the person being communicated to sees the reaction of their own thoughts and emotions in response to the thoughts and emotions the 2nd person is sending. Constructive or destructive interference as the case may be. Its all very much like radio reception. And this whole discussion so far has really been an address of this: Questioner < We have other sense that are not physical but these are completely ignored by science - I'm *really* interested in this.> Answer Well, bub, you just got the basic lecture, the first course in nonphysical perception. All that stuff above, about the mind and emotions being detectors and emitter of waves that exist in spaces that are not physical is the basic ideas behind human nonphysical perception. Let me elaborate on this some more. There are basically two levels of nonphysical perception that you have to clearly delineate. These two levels are intimately interrelated, but the distinction is important. Now, the axiom is that there are things that we can perceive but we cannot use the physical senses to perceive these things. Thus, I call these things "nonphysical". Thus, the basic axiom is "there are nonphysical things that humans can perceive". At this point, Dear reader, just go with it, pretend you believe what I am saying at least. Ultimately, these ideas must stand or fall on their own merit. These ideas are completely testable, and there is no belief, faith, or any crap like that going on here. If, after giving it an *honest* effort, you come to the conclusion that you can't perceive nonphysical things, and that all Don's talk is bullshit, well, then that's the way it'll be. But I doubt it will come to that. If you are open minded and follow my advice, you'll learn how to "see" (actually "sense") nonphysical things just as well as you sense physical things. I say this because I've tested these ideas, and they are real, and I'm not alone in this, I've only followed the instructions laid out by others and found that they were correct. So, axiom one: there are nonphysical things that are perceivable. Now, think of this: the physical things we sense with our physical senses exist in a space, a world, with its own logic and laws. Its the same with nonphysical things. They exist in their own worlds, their own spaces. Traditionally, occultists call these nonphysical spaces "planes", and since I respect occult tradition, I will also call these nonphysical worlds "planes". So we've already discussed the mental and emotional spaces. Occultists call these spaces the "astral plane" (emotion) and the "mental plane" (thought). So, not only are there nonphysical things, but there are nonphysical worlds actually - the planes. So, here's the two levels that its important to recognize when you are learning to use your nonphysical senses. 1. How the nonphysical worlds appear to us when we are awake and conscious in the physical world, and 2. how the nonphysical worlds appear when our physical senses are shut off, either by trance, sleep or death. Its really important to make this distinction otherwise you'll be completely baffled by all that's being discussed here, and either get really confused and frustrated in your attempts to learn nonphysical perception, or you will just give up and think its all bullshit. Both of these options can be easily avoided by recognizing these two levels of nonphysical perception. Now, the first level: how nonphysical things appear when we are awake and conscious in the physical world. This means our physical sense are turned on and operating at full power. When our physical sense are on, they exert a tremendous damping effect on the nonphysical stimuli that is bombarding our nonphysical senses. It takes a tremendous effort and tremendous skill to actually perceive directly the nonphysical planes while your physical sense are on. This type of perception is called "clairvoyance", and there are methods to achieve it- yoga - but these are very difficult and require a long time to perfect, and then, there are still no guarantees it'll work. There is, however, one method to at least get a minor glimpse of a *direct* perception of the nonphysical planes when the physical senses are on, and that is by using hallucinogenic drugs. When you hallucinate, you are literally seeing into the nonphysical planes. These drugs stimulate a minor degree of clairvoyance. You can believe this or not as you will, but I challenge you to come up with a more *practical* and *comprehensive* theory of the nature of these so-called "hallucinations" if you don't like my ideas. At any rate, that's all a bit of a tangent as this point. I want to elaborate on this first level of nonphysical perception: how nonphysical things appear when we are awake and conscious in the physical world. Generally speaking, this level is quite mundane. No wild color shows, no disembodied spirits, no freakish Escher landscapes (which is what the planes *really* look like!). None of this. When your physical senses are on, you have basically three detectors into the planes: your emotions, mind and third factor completely unrecognized by our culture called "buddhi". The closest thing in our society to the idea of "buddhi" is "intuition" or "creativity" or "will". All three of these facets of human psychology are the result of the operation of the buddhic faculty. However, because of the poor mental and moral climate of this society, our perceptive faculty for buddhi is severely atrophied. You can however, exercise this faculty and get it to operate much above the average, and very low, level that it commonly operates in people in this society. So, we've basically already covered this level of nonphysical perception. Your emotions and mind (and buddhi) are sensory systems that both emit and detect vibrations on the respective planes. What happens when you come to appreciate these facts is that: 1. you quite making the mistake of failing to recognize the difference between image and reality, 2. you learn to resolve the meaning you emit and that your receive from others into its three components: emotion, mind and buddhi. Incidentally, you see little of buddhi emitted by people in this society. Unfortunately, this means you have to learn to see it in your self, and then, once you do, you are confronted with the situation that you cannot really resonate with anybody on this level to any great extent, unless you have the fortunate karma to be in contact with someone that operates in the buddhic space. 3. You learn to understand and communicate with people much more fully, 4, You learn to manage you mind and emotions much more fully. This is psychological hygiene. You have a clean mind, and clean emotions, which means you no longer allow your mind to become cluttered up with uncontrolled thought-forms and their associated emotions. This state also facilitates greatly self-awareness. 5. And for the scientifically inclined, you come intimately in contact with the laws and principles of the emotional, mental and spiritual planes as these planes project themselves through the awake human being in the physical world. Because that's what's going on in this first level of nonphysical perception: what we can sense of the other planes while here awake in the physical world is but a projection, a mere infinitesimal cross section of what's really going on in these planes. This is a result of the limits of 4-d space time. Stated simply as I can, the physical world is just too small in a spacial and temporal sense to let in anything but the merest sliver of what's really going on out in these planes. Its kind of like trying to pour the ocean into a tea cup. You just can't. But still, even from this first level, even though you don't contact fully the other planes, I don't think the above list of advantages is trivial. In the end it will just make you a human being. And you will come to appreciate that the mental and moral climate of this culture creates sub-human beings, people in which 95% of their potential to experience life is wasted or ignored. So, nuff about the first level. Onto some quick comments about the second level of nonphysical perception. Here we are talking about the case in which your physical senses are turned way down or turned off as in sleep, trance and death. A case when the sense are turned down is when you are ill. Some ill people report hallucinations, and delusions, and these are both an effect of greater than usual nonphysical stimuli entering their consciousness. And when you sleep, you dream. Dreaming is a shift of focus of your consciousness from the physical plane to the astral plane (in most cases of ordinary people, dreaming is a shift of consciousness to the astral plane, but you are not inherently confined to the astral plane during sleep however). Again, you can argue all you want with this hypothesis, but until you've explored the limits of what you can do in your dreams, then I don't want to hear any stupid academic crap. For one thing, you can learn to be lucid in your dreams. This means you carry your rational faculties into your dreams for a sustained amount of time. If you learn to do this you will experience many things that will help convince you of the validity of seeing dreaming as a process of being in the planes. Being lucid in your dreams is also called "astral projection' or "out-of-body experiences". The name doesn't matter thought, its the actual experience itself that matters. Call it "Sam" for all I care. I've learned to do this and you wouldn't believe the things that can be done out there! It's absolutely incredible. I think though, what impresses me the most about being lucid in a dream is when I just stand (or float sometimes) there and look around and am completely conscious of the fact that my physical body is home in bed, but here I am standing here - somewhere - I'm really not sure where at all - but I'm definitely somewhere and its *not* the physical world, but I'm real and the things around me are real. Its an exhilarating, if not baffling, feeling, just standing there being so conscious of it. Which leads me to say this. In spite of all this theory I'm laying out about the planes, and in spite of all my experience with altered states of consciousness, I'm still weary to preach the concept of the planes as if its cold hard fact. The real fact is that I've *experienced*- no imagination, no belief - actually *experienced* all these things, these altered states of consciousness. And the theory of the planes explains more fully and comprehensively the nature of my experiences better than any other framework. But, and this is an important but, my experiences have been so complex that no words or ideas I posit can fit my experiences. Often I have no words to describe things I perceive in altered states of consciousness. So, this theory of the planes, though it's very utilitarian in terms of getting a handle on these altered states, is by no means the final word. Still, its the best available presently. So, there you have it. An introduction to nonphysical perception. Like I said, please read all this as skeptically as you wish. However, don't close your mind to the possibility. Its funny because all the occult books I've read about this stuff say the same thing; try it, test it, and if your not satisfied, we'll give you a complete refund. None of these books try to convince you of these truths, all they do is point to a direction. That's it. They point and say, "hey, I've been there, you can be there too if you want to. You don't have to believe what I say, you can go see for yourself". In this regard, Dear reader, all this stuff I've described is indeed a form of science, or at least the potential exists for it to become a science. These are not just random haphazard events. These are common events, invested with their own logic and coherence (though its a logic much different from the physical world) that everyone has the potential to experience. Again, its the moral and mental climate of our present society that suppresses, or actually, subconsciously represses, these facets of our being. But people like you and I, who question, and who are not mere sheep to just accept blindly, these are the vistas at the end of all our struggling and frustration. Its really worth the effort if you put it in. And, believe it or not, far out as all this sounds, its only the tip of the iceberg! There's just so much more to what's going on here in reality than the mass mind of our culture embraces. As you grow into these ideas, and this broader, more expanded reality, you will shed, or leave behind, the little nightmare of our culture, and, even though your physical presence is irrevocably bound up with the karma of this society, you will see it in such a broad and new light that it will all become fun and good, or whatever the hell you want it to be.

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank