By: LARRY SITES
Re: Jim Murray's LIAR Huse
Following is another perfect example of how CHRISTIAN LIARs lead fundie
fools to the slaughter. Watch as Jim Murray ignorantly attempts to battle
truth with a book of lies:
Jim Murray to Martin Goldberg on 04-27-95 18:22 re: Re: I-D-E-N-T-I-C-A-L
JM> When using radioactive dating techniques, the following
JM> >>>>assumptions<<<<< must be made:
JM> 1. The rock contained no daughter product atoms in the beginning,
JM> only parent atoms;
JM> 2. Since then, no parent or daughter atoms were either added to, o
JM> taken from the rock; and,
Not true for the Isochron method.
JM> 3. The rate of radioactive decay has remained constant.
Produce evidence to the contrary and win an instant Nobel.
JM> research suggest that certain conditions (exposure to neutrino,
JM> neutron, or cosmic radiation) may alter the rates of radioactive
Footnote 36, reference: RE Kofahl, _Handy Dandy Evolution Refuter_, 1977,
I'll wager that if you chase this back to it's scientific source, it
actually refers to the rate of carbon-14 production in the atmosphere and
doesn't have SQUAT to do with DECAY rates.
Why did he skip the reference to Barry Setterfield's throughly debunked
light speed changes in the same paragraph?
Living snails have been dated as being 2,300 yeasrs old
JM> by the carbon-14 method.
Footnote 34, reference: Keith and Anderson, "Radiocarbon Dating: Fictious
Results with Mollusk Shells", _Science_, Vol 141, 1963, p 634.
I'll GUARANTEE that ONLY a FLAIMING FUNDIE FOOL would misrepresent this as
evidence for the unreliability of carbon dating!
Wood taken from growing trees has been
JM> dated to be 10,000 years old by the same method.
Footnote 29, reference: Caryl P. Haskins, "Advances and Challenges in
Science in 1970", _American Scientist_, vol 59, May-June 1971, p 298.
JM> flows, which are known to be less than 200 years old, have been
JM> dated by the potassium-argon method at up to 3 billion years
Footnote 37, reference: WE Lammerts, _Why Not Creation_, 1973, p 388.
Another fucking liar for god and I've got the goods from the scientific
source on my hard drive to prove it, if anyone is interested!
(The above was taken from The Collapse of Evolution by
JM> Scott M. Huse, Ph.D. a computer scientist at the U.S. Air
JM> Force's Rome Laboratory.
Here's a previous example illistrating this "Ph.D." level work and more
fundie sheel led to slaughter by it:
Area # 231 EVOLUTION 10-27-94 09:59 Message # 1
From : LARRY SITES
To : ARTHUR BIELE RCVD
Subj : Huse, lord's liar
ARTHUR BIELE to JOE MORLAN on 10-25-94 23:29 re: NOT SEEN?
Why don't you deal with your past lies before generating more?
AB>"Far from being an established fact of science that it is so typically
AB>portrayed to be, Evolution is, in reality, an unreasonable and unfounde
AB>hypothesis that is riddled with countless other scientific fallacies."
AB>Scott M. Huse, former evolutionist and atheist, in his book, "The
AB>Collapse of Evolution", P 127, Baker Book House, 1983.
Get you quotes right at least. Even you authority did NOT capatalize
How would you know Huse is a former evolutionist and atheist? The book you
quote certainly says no such thing. It describes him as a teacher and
principal of Pinecrest Bible Training Center and holding the following
degrees: BS, MS, MRE, ThD, and PhD. He dedicates his book thus: This book
is dedicated to our Creator and Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ, Who alone
is worthy to recieve all glory, honor, and power.
Why didn't you quote the rest of his page 127 conclusion? The words after
your quote read, "Biblical creationism, on the other hand, does correlate
with the known facts of science. Indeed, there is an abundance of
impressive and convincing scientific evidence which can be used to justify
an intellegent faith in Biblical Christianity."
Huse is either a liar or a just plain sloppy scholar. On page 73 he says
QUOTE, "Charles Darwin acknowledged the utter inadequacy of the
evolutionary theory when attempting to account for a structure such as the
eye:". He then goes on to quote Darwins infamious out of context quote
where Darwin expresses increduality at a natural explaination for the eye.
Huse footnotes Darwin's quote, but when you look at the footnote it is NOT
a reference to _Origin of Species_, but to page 468 of E. Shute's _Flaws in
the Theory of Evolution_! Now I have not read Shute, but I HAVE read that
section of Darwin and this IS a GROSS misrepresentation. Darwin, after
first setting the stage with the APPARENT difficulty of eye development,
launches DIRECTLY into an explaination complete with examples of eyes in
various stages of development. Your fundi predicessor, Mark Fox, made the
very same false assertation and had the aduacity to attempt its unsupported
defense thus making a fool of himself.
But Huse doesn't quit there. He continues, "An incomprehensible
constellation of favorable, intergrated, and synchronized mutations would
have to occur to produce an organ such as the eye." He quotes a probability
of 1 in 10 to the power of 266 and then says, "In light of these scientific
facts, today's evolutionist would do well to abandon his dogmatic attitude
and follow the honest example of Charles Darwin who conceded this serious
flaw in the evolutionary theory." Darwin did NO SUCH THING. Huse is WRONG,
either out of ignorance or deliberate deception.
And yet Huse has the aduacity to say on page 127, "The widespread influence
of evolution is largely responsible for our moral decline of recent years.
Belief in atheistic evolution has led many individuals to reject the
Biblical account of creation, and along with that, the entire message of
the Bible itself. Herein lies the awesome danger of this Satanic delusion -
many will fail to receive the grace of God in the Gospel of Jesus Christ,
which leads to salvation and eternal life."
I suppose "evolution" makes you fundis lie for your lord, eh? It is just
such lying for the lord that leads many to reject the entire bible message.
I guess that makes you guys Satans agents, don't it?
Larry Sites JC's Fireman: Luke 12:49
Freq FORGERY.ZIP, Falisfy Fundi father fakery