Computer underground Digest Wed Jan 11, 1995 Volume 7 : Issue 01 ISSN 1004-042X Editors: J

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Computer underground Digest Wed Jan 11, 1995 Volume 7 : Issue 01 ISSN 1004-042X Editors: Jim Thomas and Gordon Meyer (TK0JUT2@NIU.BITNET) Archivist: Brendan Kehoe Retiring Shadow Archivist: Stanton McCandlish Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala Ian Dickinson Copy Reader: Laslo Toth CONTENTS, #7.02 (Wed, Jan 11, 1995) File 1-Royalities for GIFs at On-line Systems? File 2-(fwd) Unisys's response to GIF furor (fwd) File 3-Pioneer Awards--Call For Nominations File 4-Politics of telecommunications "competition" File 5-RFC: Key Capture Utility Survey File 6-(fwd) AOL announcement on crackdown on illegal activities File 7-Cu Digest Header Information (unchanged since 25 Nov 1994) CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION APPEARS IN THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 1995 09:23:58 CST From: "John D. Pritchard" Subject: File 1--Royalities for GIFs at On-line Systems? ----------------------Original message---------------------------- hi, i think the members of this list will find this interesting.. An Open Letter to Our Colleagues In the Online Communications Community: ------------------------------------------------------------------ By Pat Clawson January 2, 1995 The announcement by CompuServe and Unisys that users of the GIF image format must register by January 10 and pay a royalty or face lawsuits for their past usage, is the online communications community's equivalent of the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor. The announcement of the CompuServe-Unisys GIF Tax on December 29, during the lull between Christmas and New Year's Day, was clearly timed to cause maximum damage while an unsuspecting public celebrated the holidays. We at TeleGrafix Communications have no quarrel with those who seek to protect their intellectual property and profit from it. Indeed, we are in business to do the same. We believe those who develop software are entitled to reap financial rewards from their labors. But in our opinion, the timing and circumstances of the CompuServe- Unisys action indicates this is a shakedown of the online communications community by two powerful corporations, rather than a reasonable effort to protect intellectual property. The GIF format has been in widespread public use since 1987. Its widespread use and royalty-free licensing has been encouraged by CompuServe for years. Neither CompuServe or Unisys have made any significant improvements to GIF or its underlying LZW algorithm and compression process to justify charging for what has been free. Giving GIF users only 14 days to comply with sudden, unexpected demands to pay the private CompuServe-Unisys GIF Tax or face prosecution for past usage of what had been promoted for seven years as free, open standard software is unconscionable. It is especially outrageous since CompuServe and Unisys admit in writing that they decided to require licensing SIX MONTHS AGO in June, and didn't announce it to the public until now. According to the CompuServe-Unisys GIF licensing agreement, the settlement of the patent dispute was executed on June 21, 1994. CompuServe agreed to implement the agreement "as soon as reasonably practicable and in no case later than six (6) months after the date this Agreement is executed..." That six month period ended on December 21, 1994 -- but CompuServe did not make the licensing terms public until December 28. Indeed, CompuServe appears to have violated the terms of its own settlement agreement with Unisys. While many of the messages we have read online in reaction to the CompuServe-Unisys GIF Tax decree express both dismay and disbelief, virtually none have analyzed the actual provisions of the licensing agreement. It is in this area that TeleGrafix Communications wishes to contribute to the dialogue. In our opinion, the CompuServe-Unisys licensing agreement is both illogical and overly broad. Let's examine some of its key provisions. All quotes cited are directly from the agreement. 1. CompuServe will license Developers who want to use GIF technology. The term "developer" is defined as "the other undersigned party to the agreement," and it seems to apply to ANYONE who contemplates distributing any product that uses the GIF format. 2. Developers will be licensed to sell or distribute "Products" that "use and exploit GIF ... solely within the Field of Use." The term "Field of Use" is defined as "primarily for accessing the CompuServe Information Service and for manipulating and viewing data received through the CompuServe Information Service." The licensing agreement further defines the term "Products" as being "software that is developed or distributed ... which is designed for and used primarily for accessing the CompuServe Information Service and for manipulating and viewing data received through the CompuServe Information Service." IT APPEARS THAT THE ONLY LAWFUL USE OF GIF WILL BE FOR COMPUSERVE-RELATED PRODUCTS. Using GIF images in any other manner, such as on CD-ROMs or bulletin board systems, is prohibited. Most of the thousands of products that have used GIF in some manner are henceforth contraband. 3. Developers may no longer "use, copy, modify or distribute the GIF specification, except as expressly permitted by CompuServe." This states that the GIF specification can no longer be shared, published or uploaded in any manner without the express consent of CompuServe. 4. Members of the public are prohibited from using any software product containing GIF until they have become a REGISTERED user of the product. The customer also must agree to use the product "primarily for accessing the CompuServe Information Service and for manipulating and viewing data received through the CompuServe Information Service." This virtually eliminates the concept of freeware or shareware containing GIF capabilities, since prospective customers can no longer try out these software products without registering them first. 5. Software developers must pay $1.00 for a license to use GIF, PLUS a fee equal to the GREATER of 1.5% of the selling price of the product, or $0.15 per "Disposition." Disposition is defined as "the sale, lease or license or any other grant of rights to a Product or any new Product." All royalties must be paid quarterly. Noncommercial and freeware usage of GIF technology is NOT exempted from the royalty requirement. Because the royalty provisions and definition of "Disposition" are so broad in scope, it appears that a GIF Tax payment may be due to CompuServe-Unisys each time a GIF image is transmitted via BBS or Internet. The operators of a BBS or World Wide Web site with hundreds or thousands of GIF images online could easily be bankrupted by these licensing requirements. 6. CompuServe must be notified of ANY new product using GIF when it is first offered to customers. 7. Persons using GIF must keep records of its use, and CompuServe has the right to audit those records every year upon seven days notice. Persons using GIF must pay the cost of the audit if a royalty underpayment of 10% or more is discovered, along with 12% interest on any underpaid royalties. 8. Even if the patent is later found by the courts or the U.S. Patent Office to be invalid and unenforcable, or if the patent expires, any developer must "return all copies of the GIF specification and any confidential information of CompuServe then in its possession or control to CompuServe, (ii) stop using the Licensed Technology, and (iii) stop distributing Products." This states that EVEN IF THE PATENT IS OVERTURNED OR EXPIRES, YOU MUST STOP USING OR DISTRIBUTING GIF. 9. Even though CompuServe has publicly disseminated the text of the agreement it wants GIF users to sign, the terms of the agreement are to remain confidential. This is illogical, to say the least, since they have posted it for public download on their own system. 10. Developers have to indemnify and hold CompuServe harmless for any damages if their CUSTOMERS somehow use GIF technology in a way not permitted by the licensing agreement. 11. Unisys has the right to enforce the agreement, as well as CompuServe. Further, Unisys has the right to pursue legal action or seek damages against Developers even after the agreement has terminated. TeleGrafix Communicatons Inc. will not sign such a licensing agreement. We think most other software developers, BBS sysops and Web site operators also will refuse to sign. We encourage our colleagues in the online communications community to evaluate the CompuServe-Unisys action, and to lodge appropriate protests directly with those companies. We believe that the CompuServe-Unisys GIF Tax drives a stake through the heart of Internet development. It will cripple the World Wide Web, NCSA Mosaic, and other Internet multimedia technologies that rely heavily on GIF imaging. Fortunately, we at TeleGrafix Communications do not depend on GIF imaging in our new RIPscrip 2.0 online multimedia technologies. We chose to implement the JPEG image format and only recently decided to add GIF support as a convienience to our customers. Due to the restrictive conditions of the CompuServe-Unisys GIF Tax and licensing agreement, we must now reevaluate our plans for supporting GIF use in the upcoming release of RIPscrip 2.0. While our company hopes to profit financially from our advanced RIPscrip 2.0 technology, we will not demand royalties from those who have used the freeware versions of our earlier RIPscrip 1.54 products and/or technical specifications. The RIPscrip 2.0 specification also will be made public for third-party use after it is finalized. We expect that the CompuServe-Unisys action will spell the death of GIF as a commercially viable technology, shifting the attention of the online communications community to JPEG imaging. Sincerely, Pat Clawson President & Chief Executive Officer TeleGrafix Communications Inc. Huntington Beach, CA Voice: (714) 379-2140 Fax: (714) 379-2132 BBS: (714) 379-2133 Internet: ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 22:09:21 -0600 (CST) From: David Smith Subject: File 2--(fwd) Unisys's response to GIF furor (fwd) Here's the scoop, from Unisys themselves. thanks, | "The most exciting breakthroughs of the 21st century | will not occur because of technology but because David Smith | of an expanding concept of what it means to be human." | -- John Naisbitt / Patricia Aburdene ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From the GRAPHSUPPORT forum on CompuServe: January 6, 1995 Unisys Clarifies Policy Regarding Patent Use in On-Line Service Offerings The concerns, inquiries and some apparent confusion that have resulted from the December CompuServe advisory clearly indicate that we need to clarify our policy concerning the use of the Unisys Lev Zempel Welch (LZW) patent by software developers for the major on-line services. We want to reiterate earlier communications that the issue of patent licenses is not focused on the end users of on-line networks, including the Internet. We encourage end users to continue to take full advantage of the outstanding benefits of a rapidly growing on-line community. Unisys was awarded the patent in 1985. We became aware of the increasing interest in our LZW patent beginning in 1990 when many companies approached us to license the patent for their hardware and software products. The growth in the use of compression technology was mushrooming in order to meet the demands for transmitting increased amounts of data. To date, more than 100 companies, including hardware, software and on-line information services, have licensed the Unisys LZW technology. Two years ago, Unisys learned that the LZW method was incorporated in the GIF specification and immediately began negotiations with CompuServe in January of 1993. We reached agreement with CompuServe on licensing the technology in June 1994, which calls for CompuServe to pay Unisys a royalty of 1% of the average selling price it charges for its software. This represents approximately 11 cents for each copy sold and connected to its information service. Under the agreement, CompuServe, at its discretion, could relicense the LZW technology to commercial developers using the GIF specification in software that connected directly to the CompuServe information service. With the agreement completed on June 21, 1994, CompuServe was given six months to implement the terms of its license. CompuServe later asked for a one-month extension, which we granted. Unisys did not require CompuServe to pass on any fee to its sublicensees or end users. Such a decision, and the content and timing of CompuServe+s advisory, was at their discretion. Consistent with the entire information industry+s desire to protect intellectual property, Unisys will expect all of the major commercial on-line information services companies employing the LZW patent to license the technology from Unisys at a reasonable rate. The on-line service companies are not required to sublicense the technology to developers producing software for the commercial on-line services. It will be, as it is today, at the on-line service+s discretion as to whether it charges a license fee to developers or chooses an alternative method to account for its licensing fees payable to Unisys. We recognize and are concerned -- thanks in large part to the recent and very active use of the on-line network -- that developers did not understand that the patented technology was resident in GIF. Taking that into account, Unisys does not intend to pursue previous inadvertent infringement by versions of GIF-based software products marketed prior to 1995. Concerning all future software product development and enhancement of existing products for accessing on-line services, Unisys expects developers of commercial, for-profit software to secure a license from Unisys, or through the licensed on-line service, for the use of the patented technology. The very reasonable terms should prove no financial barrier to the introduction of product into the on-line network. Unisys does not require licensing, or fees to be paid, for non-commercial, non-profit GIF-based applications, including those for use on the on-line services. Concerning developers of software for the Internet network, the same principle applies. Unisys will not pursue previous inadvertent infringement by developers producing versions of software products for the Internet prior to 1995. The company does not require licensing, or fees to be paid for non-commercial, non-profit offerings on the Internet, including +Freeware+. Commercial developers of GIF-based software for the Internet are expected to secure a licensing agreement with Unisys for software products introduced beginning in 1995, or enhancements of products that were introduced prior to 1995. Again, terms should not preclude the entry by these firms into the marketplace. For organizations introducing World Wide Web servers and +Home Page+ offerings, most will not be required to secure a license from Unisys. Most organizations acquire software from other developers to create their offerings on their servers. Therefore, only the software firms who sell the enabling software for profit would be expected to secure a licensing agreement from Unisys. Unisys understands that this issue has caused concern. We want to reassure all users and developers that we are strong proponents of the on-line industry. We+re proud that this important Unisys technology has played a role in the introduction of innovative products and services, many of which are fueling the explosive growth of the information superhighway. As members of the information community we want to strike the appropriate balance between information access and the rights of all information companies, including the developers of software, to protect their intellectual property rights. Patent information: Contact Welch Patent Licensing Department; Unisys; Mail Stop C1SW19; P.O. Box 500, Blue Bell, PA 19424. Or via Internet, send E-mail to LZW_INFOUNISYS.COM, or use a form available on the Home Page of the Unisys Web Server (http:\\ to request follow-up information. Media contacts: Unisys Public Relations -- Bob O+Leary (215) 986-6413 or Oliver Picher (215) 986-5367 ------------------------------ From: Mike Godwin Subject: File 3--Pioneer Awards--Call For Nominations Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 09:06:41 -0500 (EST) THE FOURTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL EFF PIONEER AWARDS: CALL FOR NOMINATIONS Deadline: January 20, 1995 In every field of human endeavor,there are those dedicated to expanding knowledge,freedom,efficiency and utility. Along the electronic frontier, this is especially true. To recognize this, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has established the Pioneer Awards for deserving individuals and organizations. The Pioneer Awards are international and nominations are open to all. In March of 1992, the first EFF Pioneer Awards were given in Washington D.C. The winners were: Douglas C. Engelbart, Robert Kahn, Jim Warren, Tom Jennings, and Andrzej Smereczynski. The 1993 Pioneer Award recipients were Paul Baran, Vinton Cerf, Ward Christensen, Dave Hughes and the USENET software developers, represented by the software's originators Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis. The 1994 Pioneer Award winners were Ivan Sutherland, Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman, Murray Turoff and Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Lee Felsenstein, Bill Atkinson, and the WELL. The Fourth Annual Pioneer Awards will be given in Burlingame, California, at the 5th Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy, which will take place on March 28-31 in 1995. All valid nominations will be reviewed by a panel of impartial judges chosen for their knowledge of computer-based communications and the technical, legal, and social issues involved in networking. There are no specific categories for the Pioneer Awards, but the following guidelines apply: 1) The nominees must have made a substantial contribution to the health, growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based communications. 2) The contribution may be technical, social, economic or cultural. 3) Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or organizations in the private or public sectors. 4) Nominations are open to all, and you may nominate more than one recipient. You may nominate yourself or your organization. 5) All nominations, to be valid, must contain your reasons, however brief, for nominating the individual or organization, along with a means of contacting the nominee, and your own contact number. Anonymous nominations will be allowed, but we prefer to be able to contact the nominating parties in the event that we need more information.. 6) Every person or organization, with the single exception of EFF staff members, are eligible for Pioneer Awards. 7) Persons or representatives of organizations receiving a Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at the Foundation's expense. You may nominate as many as you wish, but please use one form per nomination. You may return the forms to us via email to You may mail them to us at: Electronic Frontier Foundation attn: Pioneer Awards 1667 K St. NW Suite 801 Washington, DC 20006 You may FAX them to us at: +1 202-861-1258 Just tell us the name of the nominee, the phone number or email address at which the nominee can be reached, and, most important, why you feel the nominee deserves the award. You may attach supporting documentation. Please include your own name, address, and phone number. We're looking for the Pioneers of the Electronic Frontier that have made and are making a difference. Thanks for helping us find them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation -------EFF Pioneer Awards Nomination Form------ Please return to the Electronic Frontier Foundation via email to: via surface mail to: Electronic Frontier Foundation attn: Pioneer Awards 1667 K St. NW Suite 801 Washington, DC 20006 You may FAX them to us at: +1 202-861-1258 Nominee: Title: Company/Organization: Contact number or email address: Reason for nomination: Your name and contact information: Extra documentation attached: DEADLINE: ALL NOMINATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION BY MIDNIGHT, EASTERN STANDARD TIME U.S., JANUARY 20, 1995. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 17:46:44 CST From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS Subject: File 4-- Politics of telecommunications "competition" ================================================================== FINS SPECIAL REPORT January 10, 1995 ================================================================== POLITICS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS "COMPETITION" Dramatic Clash Over Real Competition, and Giant Collaborators Washington, DC--Vice President Al Gore, addressing a Federal-State-Local Telecommunications Summit in the U.S. Capitol, Jan 9, underscored the administration's goal to seek "real competition" in the marketplace of local telephone exchange services [Fins-II2-01]. The Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) presently enjoy monopoly power and complete control over virtually all of the telephone traffic in the local bottleneck, reliable industry reports disclose. Gore's remarks were aimed squarely at the proposal made last year by Senate Finance Chairman Bob Packwood (R-OR) and Sen. John Breaux (D.LA), calling for complete deregulation of the telecommunications industry by a date certain-without regard to competitive conditions--expected to be presented again this year. Gore stated that "the game should not begin on some arbitrary date without rules at all on the mistaken assumption that a calendar can replace a rulebooks." He added that "Too many people and businesses have too much at stake to be subject to the vagaries of trying to play now and figure out the rule later." The administration "cannot support a proposal to fully deregulate the local telephone exchanges upon the mere prospect that some theoretical competitor might be able to provide some services to some hypothetical customer," Gore added. The Vice President's remarks provided a dramatic backdrop for a hearing on telecommunications issues held Jan 9, in the U.S. Senate by the full Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (Pressler, R-SD, Chairman). The list of witnesses scheduled to attend the Senate hearing included, no Democrats, but all the Republican big guns on telecommunications matters: Senate Majority Leader Dole (R-KS), House Speaker Gingrich (D-GA), House Commerce Chairman Bliley (R-VA), and House Commerce Telecommunications and Finance Subcommittee Chairman Jack Fields (R-TX). Sen. Packwood and Sen. Breaux engaged the witnesses in a spirited discussion concerning their proposal for setting a specific date for local telecommunications competition to begin. "Gentlemen, let the games begin" Sen Packwood exclaimed. Packwood said that Congress should not try to set fair rules for competition because that would defeat the objective of having a simple administrative process. "There will be winners and loosers, and the government should not decide such matters ... the marketplace should," Packwood declared. Republican members of the Commerce Committee seemed to agree with the Packwood formula, although Sen. Stevens (R-Alaska) and Snow (R-Maine) appeared concerned about the potential adverse impact on rural America. The House witnesses generally supported the idea, although none of the members were unable to come up with a viable formula that would assure "a level playing field" in an industry that is currently dominated by monopolists and oligopolists. Speaker Gingrich did not show up for the Senate hearing. However, Gingrich has devoted considerable intellectual efforts to this subject in the past [See e.g., The Futurist, June 1985]. Moreover, reports circulating around the U.S. Capitol during recent weeks indicate that Gingrich intends to play an important role in designing the future of "the Knowledge Age." INTERACTIVE AGE, reported Dec 12, 1994 that Speaker Newt Gingrich was "looking to a new think tank to map out a Vision of America's high-tech future." The Progress and Freedom Foundation, established for that purpose, has close links to Gingrich according to IA. Placed under retainer by The Progress and Freedom Foundation, are well known technocrats George Gilder, Alvin Toffler, Jay Keyworth, and Esther Dyson, who have written a plan calling for "deregulation of every aspect of telecommunications." The vision document, which was written by those celebrities of technology is called the "Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age" [Fins-PaN-18]. The document was ultimately expected to be passed on to Gingrich and his aides, as a basis for legislative planning, according to IA. The "Magna Carta" calls for sweeping deregulation of telecommunications, in the name of promoting "competition," while also calling for "much greater collaboration between the cable industry and phone companies." What is intended is a plan to join the huge fiber optic resources of the phone companies with the massive asset of 57 million broadband links (i.e. into homes now receiving cable-TV service) of the cable TV companies to produce a new kind of national network -- multimedia, interactive. The planners hope that this network would become accessible to Americans of modest means "as costs fall." The authors of the "Magna Carta" attempt to explain the evident sharp contradiction in their plan, between promoting competition through sweeping deregulation and santioning collaboration between the two largest players, with this rationale: ... obstructing such collaboration -- in the cause of forcing a competition between the cable and phone industries -- is socially elitist. To the extent it prevents collaboration between the cable industry and the phone companies, present federal policy actually thwarts the administration's own goals of access and empowerment. Bell Atlantic Corp., and Telecommunications Inc., proposed last October, a merger of phone and cable resources that could have paved the way for such a national network. A number of lawmakers such as Rep. Edward L. Markey (D-MA), and Sen. Howard M. Metzenbaum (D-OH), expressed "extreme concern" over the anticompetitive nature of the proposed Bell-TCI merger, and the plan was eventually scrapped under a cloud of uncertainty. George Gilder, one of the team of technocrats who wrote the "Magna Carta" now writes about telecommunications issues for Forbes, ASAP. In an article appearing in the June 6, 1994 issue of Forbes ASAP, Gilder indicated a strong interest in the theory of unrestrained *laissez-faire* capitalism, and called for a return to the ideas advanced by the Robber Barons of the 19th century--Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P. Morgan--who he claimed were the architects of America's early industrial growth. Toffler is known as "The Buck Rogers of Blip Sociology." He was co-founder of the World Future Society and author of the landmark work, "Future Shock" and best seller "The Third Wave," concerned with radical changes in civilization brought about by the evolution of technology. Keyworth, was director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy under the Reagan administration. Dyson, is an essayist and lecturer on computer information, and head of Computer Industry Daily. ================================================================== BECOME A MEMBER OF FINS--COLLABORATE IN ADVANCING THE GENIUS OF CYBERSPACE --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW Personal Subscription: $2.95 a year. Receive 24 issues of your own copy of Fins News Column, plus Special Reports and Fins Information Age Library. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher, 18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042. Copyright 1995 FINS. Internet: Browse Fins Information Age Lib located at the inforM system of the University of Maryland. With a gopher client gopher to and go to the directory Educational_Resources/ AcademicResourcesByTopic/Computers_and_Society/Fins_Information_Age. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 2 Jan 1995 12:24:35 -0800 From: KEY-CAPTURE@LSD.COM(Dave Del Torto) Subject: File 5--RFC: Key Capture Utility Survey REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON KEY CAPTURE UTILITIES --------------------------------------------- Key capture utilities present a serious threat to the security of passwords on individual and networked computing systems, especially when novice users are unaware of their presence. Well-educated users and administrators help make all systems on and off the Internet more reliably safe for everyone's data. If you are a: -- privacy, system security or cryptography advocate/activist -- network admin concerned with the password-hygiene of your users or -- computing professional with an appreciation of good security, then please complete and return this quick survey. By contributing to the knowledgebase on the subject of password protection, you can help educate yourself and many novice/intermediate users about a common weakness --utilities that may capture their keystrokes unseen as they enter their *password* -- in ALL secured systems (a user's encryption app, your network or its dial-in access, your company's email system or database fileserver, etc.). The intent here is to create a *central list of all key-capture utilities* which will help people to at least be aware of their existence or operation on a given system and describe in simple terms how to disable the utility. The results of the survey will be tabulated and put in the public domain on the Internet. If your reply is included, your name will be acknowledged in the resulting document, which will be: part of the new "Beginner's PGP FAQ" for new users of the PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) application; a msg posted on various Internet lists and online services and; a text file available by anonymous FTP as: Please forward this survey to anyone you think can/will help - and thanks in advance for your contribution! _______________________________ THE KEY CAPTURE UTILITY SURVEY: The survey is very easy to participate in. Just send as much information as you can, even if you're only partially able to complete the form. Every piece of information that can lead us to the utility - even just a fragment of a name and an email address of someone who might know more about it - will help us compile a fairly exhaustive list. To assist us in easily tabulating the incoming mail on this topic, please send your reply to: - - - - Format your answer as follows: ******* PLEASE RETURN ONLY THIS INFORMATION ******* TO: SUBJ: PLATFORM/Utility Name MSG BODY: [1] OPERATING-SYS <--- i.e. WIN/DOS/MAC/OS2/UNIX, etc. [2] "Utility-Name" (utility-package-name, if not a stand-alone product) [3] Developer-Name (company-individual) [4] [5] Type <--- i.e.: system extension, autoexec, TSR [6] Path-to-file-location-when-loaded. [7] How to disable the utility's key capturing operations (step-by-step if possible). Please be brief, but aim for a novice level user. If disabling the key capturing is too complex to describe easily, then just explain what the user should ask a sys admin to do for them (while they watch, if applicable). *************************************************** (Here's an Example:) SUBJ: MAC/Now Save MSG BODY: [1] MAC [2] "Now Save" (Now Utilities v5.x), "NowSave" (Now Utilities v4.x) [3] Now Software, Inc. [4] [5] System extension/Control Panel device (CDEV) [6] [startup HD]:System Folder:Control Panels:Now Save (or :NowSave) [7] How to Disable: Open the "NowSave" (v4.x) or "Now Save" (v5.x) Control Panel. v4.x: Click the "Preferences" button. Click the "Key Capture..." button. Click the "OFF" radio button (upper right corner of dialog). Click the "OK" button. v5.0: Click the "Key Capture..." button in the button-bar. Click the "OFF" radio button (in upper right corner of dialog). Click the "OK" button. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 22:36:22 -0600 (CST) From: David Smith Subject: File 6--(fwd) AOL announcement on crackdown on illegal activities ---------- Forwarded message ---------- ====== AOL Community Update ====== 1/6 Community Update Ever since we first launched America Online we've remained committed to fostering an electronic community that provides a fun, enjoyable and enriching experience for all members. We've asked our members to honor the privilege of interactivity, and we've strictly enforced our Terms of Service to help foster the kind of community of which we can all be proud. Recently, however, some material has been brought to our attention by some of our members which involves illegal activity -- the trading of images in electronic mail which appear to be child pornography. Upon receiving the material, and verifying that it was a violation of our Terms of Service, and in all likelihood illegal, we immediately contacted the FBI and terminated the accounts of the senders. While we recognize that any community around the United States with more than 1.5 million citizens will have its share of illegal activity, we were nonetheless disheartened to find that some members are abusing the communications features of AOL in this way. We simply will not tolerate such illegal activity on America Online. To anyone who may be using America Online for illegal purposes, be advised that we will terminate the accounts of those participating and we will notify the proper authorities of any illegal activity that is brought to our attention. Our policy is that all private communications -- including e-mail, instant messages, and private chat rooms -- are strictly private. We do not, will not, and legally cannot monitor any private communications. But if we are alerted to a potential offense and we are sent evidence, as we were recently, we will vigorously pursue the matter. In this case, electronic mail was forwarded to our attention by our members, and as recipients of the mail we were able to turn the material over to the authorities. We have over 250 people who help us provide assistance in the public areas of the service and give guidance to members who are new or who have questions. Of late, we've had a growing problem with member-created rooms whose title and discussion violate our Terms of Service. Member-created rooms have always been a unique and much-valued aspect of America Online. Often, these rooms provide the seeds for new special interest forums that later emerge. But as more members abuse the privilege and establish rooms that suggest illegal activity, or detract from the enjoyment of others with offensive titles, we are faced with looking at a higher level of safeguards as it relates to member-created rooms. We simply cannot keep up with the sheer volume of rooms created, and as a result, from time to time rooms that violate TOS remain open for some period of time. We're looking at several alternatives to improve the situation. We don't want to see our members denied the privilege of this fun and creative interactive environment due to the abuses of a few, but at the same time we do feel some action is warranted to safeguard this popular "neighborhood" in our community. Unfortunately, this is not the first time we have encountered this problem, nor is it unique to AOL. In 1991, we were faced with a similar situation. At that time, we went to our members -- as we're doing now --advised them of the situation and asked for their help. And recently, recognizing the potential for abuses in this emerging medium, online service providers banded together to sponsor a "child safety" brochure that gives parents tips and guidelines to foster a productive and safe environment for children online. A copy of this brochure can be found in the Parents Information Center, keyword: Parents. We encourage parents to take the time to review it. In addition we strongly encourage parents to monitor their children's use of this medium, much as they would any other medium such as television, magazines, etc. We've also implemented "parental controls" which allow parents to restrict their children's online access. Each one of us needs to respect and honor the privileges of this electronic community. If you haven't reviewed our Terms of Service, take a few minutes now and do so. If you observe what you believe may be illegal activity on AOL, bring it to our attention. The problem is not widespread -- we believe only a mere fraction of this community is involved. Let's work together to insure that America Online remains the kind of community that you want your friends and family to enjoy. Thanks for your continued support. Transmitted: 95-01-06 17:07:42 EST ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1994 22:51:01 CDT From: CuD Moderators Subject: File 7--Cu Digest Header Information (unchanged since 25 Nov 1994) Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are available at no cost electronically. CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: Or, to subscribe, send a one-line message: SUB CUDIGEST your name Send it to LISTSERV@UIUCVMD.BITNET or LISTSERV@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-0303), fax (815-753-6302) or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;" On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG; on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet); and on Rune Stone BBS (IIRGWHQ) (203) 832-8441. CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from 1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome. EUROPE: In BELGIUM: Virtual Access BBS: +32-69-844-019 (ringdown) In ITALY: Bits against the Empire BBS: +39-461-980493 In LUXEMBOURG: ComNet BBS: +352-466893 UNITED STATES: ( in /pub/CuD/ ( in /pub/Publications/CuD/ ( in /pub/eff/cud/ in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ in /pub/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ EUROPE: in pub/doc/cud/ (Finland) in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom) JAPAN: /mirror/ The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the NIU Sociology gopher at: URL: gopher:// COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts unless absolutely necessary. DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not violate copyright protections. ------------------------------ End of Computer Underground Digest #7.02 ************************************


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank