}I have heard this assertion a couple of times, and actually find }it rather puzzling just

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

}I have heard this assertion a couple of times, and actually find }it rather puzzling - just how does, in your opinion, Dawkins assign }a meaning to the term "selfish?" By writing it in the first chapter of his book: Before going any further, we need a definition. An entity, such as a baboon, is said to be altruistic if it behaves in such a way as to increase another such entity's welfare at the expense of its own. Selfish behaviour has exactly the opposite effect. 'Welfare' is defined as 'chances of survival', even if the effect on actual life and death prospects is so small as to _seem_ [emphasis in original] negligible. One of the surprising consequences of the modern version of the Darwinian theory is that apparently trivial tiny influences on survival probability can have a major impact on evolution. This is because of the enormous time available for such in- fluences to make themselves felt. It is important to realize that the above definitions of al- truism and selfishness are _behavioural_ [emphasis in original], not subjective. I am not concerned here with the psychology of motives...My definition is concerned only with whether the _ef- fect_ [emphasis in original] of an act is to lower or raise the survival prospects of the presumed altruist and the survival prospects of the presumed beneficiary. -- Richard Dawkins, _The Selfish Gene_ (page 4 in the 1976 paperback edition)

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank