Flood Evidence [sic] True Facts #5
RS> EVIDENCE [sic] #2
RS> Widespread deposits.... 70 miles east lie the Shinarump
RS> conglomerate. A belt 90 feet thick, covering 100,000 sq miles
RS> in New Mexico... they are similar to deposits caused by water
RS> formations. they are not lake deposits which are made of fine
RS> silt, clay and are very even deposits. The sediments are coarser
RS> like that a river would form however it stretches the mind
RS> to think of a 100,000 sq. mile river that would deposit layers
RS> so thin. Both the Shinarump formation and the Chinle formation
RS> above it have petrified wood mixed in with course rocky
RS> sediment... different areas all washed in together? This is also
RS> common in Steinkar Lake (where the strata ought to be silt) Utah,
RS> Red Canyon Wyoming, and the Dakota Formation in S. Dakota. We
RS> also see this very same pattern and once more dinosaur fossils
RS> covered by marine fossils (oceanic strata) in the Morrison
RS> Formation an area covering 400,000 sq. miles from Texas to
RS> Canada. Different deposits located in different areas totally
RS> unfamiliar to their respective areas. Hmmmmm???? or theories.
RS> Let's say for example I
[Incomplete transmission of data. Maybe it was Satan?]
It seems Creationists never heard of volcanism and glaciers! Why
don't they understand just how long it takes to petrify wood and
the requirements of the environment to do so?
What exactly this "evidence" is not at all clear. How about if
the cult that make this claim were to restate it better; as it is,
it makes no claim of "Noah's Flood" being the mechanism behind
whatever it is claiming.
The above Creationist Religion quote says "ought to be silt." WHY?!
Observed plate tectonics, volcanisms, and evidence of glaciers
falsifies this "evidence."