James G. Acker Jun1493 07:00AM Creationist perspective Mark Isaak (isaak@aurora.com) wrote

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

James G. Acker Jun-14-93 07:00AM Creationist perspective Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- InterNetNews site From: jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov (James G. Acker) Message-ID: <1vi3qe$h9n@skates.gsfc.nasa.gov> Newsgroups: talk.origins Mark Isaak (isaak@aurora.com) wrote: : It occurs to me that I have seldom if ever seen addressed on talk.origins : the only reason I have seen a Creationist give for being a Creationist. : Henry Morris, and I believe others in the ICR, say that if Genesis isn't : true, then the rest of the Bible can't be trusted, and they believe : something must be literal for it to be true. Do other Creationists : hold these same views? From personal experience and not research: (I have to note as well, I'm joining a new church, and it looks like I'll never become an officer (deacon, Elder), because I'd have to swear that the Bible is inerrant. Their interpretation of "inerrancy" is not the same as mine, so I won't be able to do it. They will, however, let me joing as a member without taking an oath about inerrancy. The church is a member of the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA), not to be confused with the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. or the Evangelical Presbyterian Church.) Now that I've cleared that up: The issue is reading the Bible as literal and inerrant. Literal means that what the Bible says describes exactly what happened; inerrant means that the Bible is without error. Some inerrantists allow that "human" errors may have crept into the text due to translation and copying problems, but the original Word of God was inerrant. Those holding strongly to this doctrine (primarily fundamentalists, especially Southern Baptists) do not believe that if Genesis isn't true then the rest of the Bible can't be trusted. At the core, they believe that the entire Bible can be trusted as _verifiable fact_. This belief appears to motivate Creationists to search for facts which verify the Creation Story, and also motivates them to criticize the evolutionary/ geologic history of the Earth, because "if the Bible isn't wrong, then anything which implies the Bible might be wrong _has_ to be wrong." Because they have an unswerving devotion to a text, they also become extremely bound by what their denomination of the Church says is the proper mode of thinking, being, and acting. Not every fundamentalist is looking for control; rather, they are being strongly controlled by the tenets which their denomination puts forth. Rather than allowing for one's personal faith to guide their interpretation of the Bible, they let others tell them what the Bible says, and become fanatically and intensely devoted to those strict interpretations. Thus, in spite of all the reasonable arguments which may be put forth in refutation of the Genesis Creation story and in favor of the geologic/biologic history of the Earth, a fundamentalist mindset is unlikely to be swayed. Their position is not one of logic and reason -- it is blind adherence to one interpretation of the Bible. That's what I've seen. Jim Acker jgacker@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank