To: All Msg #75, Oct1092 03:35AM Subject: Goff's back. FollowupTo: talk.origins This and a

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

From: Simon Clippingdale To: All Msg #75, Oct-10-92 03:35AM Subject: Goff's back. Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England From: simon@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Simon Clippingdale) Message-ID: 1992Oct10.113511.25848@dcs.warwick.ac.uk Followup-To: talk.origins Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.origins This and a few other "evo is crap and this is a well-known scientific fact" posts from Vicky Goff have appeared on alt.atheism. Note crosspost and followups to talk.origins, where it belongs, with apologies to those who remember Vicky "Burn In Hell, Scum - Oops, It Wasn't Me, Someone Must Have Used My Account" Goff from some months ago. At that time, sympathy was invited because supposedly you (Ms. Goff) were in deep fudge with your employer over the fanatical drivel issuing from your account, and of course it couldn't have been you. So why have you started again? Are you the real Vicky Goff or what? In article <1992Oct9.183402.3997@cs.tulane.edu> goff@pops.navo.navy.mil writes: > > Excuse me. Evolution is not a well established fact. It has major problems > and I could explain them if anyone really wanted to listen. The problems > with evolution are such that it can be soundly disproved and is in > respectable scientific circles. Bullshit lies from start to finish (do I sound like Ted?). You are either aware of this and deliberately lying, or you are screaming mad. Or both. Please post your sound disproof, and since it is apparently accepted in "respectable scientific circles" you can doubtless give references to the primary refereed scientific literature. > Let us think...and reason! If only. > v.goff "Not an evolutionist, not a creationist. A revelationist" A seasoned, apparently unreconstucted and widely renowned idiot. > Disclaimer: My opinions are my own. As someone else has pointed out, this is false. Your opinions are those of your religion, albeit interpreted in a particularly unhinged way. Your God help us all if the US Navy let you play with anything dangerous. Cheers Simon -- Simon Clippingdale simon@dcs.warwick.ac.uk Department of Computer Science Tel (+44) 203 523296 University of Warwick FAX (+44) 203 525714 Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Simon Clippingdale To: All Msg #76, Oct-10-92 03:43AM Subject: More Goff Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England From: simon@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Simon Clippingdale) Message-ID: 1992Oct10.114305.26095@dcs.warwick.ac.uk Followup-To: talk.origins Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.origins Yup, crossposted (from alt.atheism) and followups set to talk.origins. In article <1992Oct9.181919.26472@cs.tulane.edu> goff@pops.navo.navy.mil writes: > > I can absolutely prove evolution to be incorrect but the same argument does > not prove the existance of God. Do it. Enquiring minds with a grip on reality want to know how this has evaded them. > [...] > > BTW, evolution is NOT a logical alternative [to God] by any stretch of > the imagination and don't worry, you can still be an atheist and a > non-evolutionist. Don't worry, you can still be a Christian and accept the fact of evolution. > v.goff - "Not an evolutionist, not a creationist. A revelationist" Waaaaah. Cheers Simon -- Simon Clippingdale simon@dcs.warwick.ac.uk Department of Computer Science Tel (+44) 203 523296 University of Warwick FAX (+44) 203 525714 Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank