1. If creationsim is capable of enduring the scientific method, then (a) there are testabl

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

1. If creationsim is capable of enduring the scientific method, then (a) there are testable hypotheses and predictions made by some creationist theory (by the way, what IS the theory of creationism?), (b) there are repeatable experiments which will yield data bearing on the confirmation or disconfirmation of the theory (by the way, what IS the theory of creationism?), (c) there are publically reviewable ("peer review") observations that bear on the confirmation / disconfirmation of the theory (by the way, what IS the theory of creationism?), and (d) there are evidentially supported ("predicted") conclusions, drawn from experimental / observational data such that these conclusions are better supported by all the available data than any rival theory (by the way, just what IS the theory of creationism, anyway?). 2. Score for creationism: not (a), not (b), not (c), and not (d). Therefore, Creationism is not capable of enduring the scientific method. It is not scientific. It is an occult theology.

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank