To: David Myers 09Jun89 03:37pm Subject: Re: IQ ETC. DM I heard a creationist once claim t

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

From: Henry Shaw To: David Myers 09-Jun-89 03:37pm Subject: Re: IQ ETC. DM> I heard a creationist once claim that potassium-argon dating could DM> give misleadingly large dates because of argon penetrating rock. DM> An acquaintance of mine countered by saying that the argon DM> formed from potassium isn't the same isotope, and that leakage would DM> age UNDER-estimates. true? K-Ar dating is based on the decay of K-40 to Ar-40 by electron-capture. K-40 can also decay to Ca-40 via beta decay. About 12% of the time, a K-40 nucleus will decay to Ar-40 and 88% of the time, to Ca-40. The K-Ca isotopic system has only limited application for various technical reasons. In traditional K-Ar dating, one crushes a mineral or rock sample and splits the powder into two fractions. One measures the K concentration in one "split", usually by atomic emission or absorption spectrometry. The other split is placed into an evacuated tube and heated to temperatures exceeding 1400 deg C using an RF furnace. At these temperatures, most rocks will melt, and the Ar (and other gasses) are driven off from the sample. It is important to note that Ar is a noble gas, and does not readily form compounds. One then adds a known quantity of Ar gas made up of a single isotope of Ar, usually Ar-38, to the gas given off by the sample. This is known as "spiking", and it allows one to calculate the absolute amount of Ar released by the sample. The resulting mixture is then purified to remove other gasses, and the isotopic composition of the purified Ar is then measured using a mass spectrometer. Now even though Ar is not a proper constituent of minerals, is it possible for some Ar to be trapped by the mineral when it forms, either in tiny bubbles known as fluid inclusions, or in defects in the crystal structure, or simply adsorbed on the surfaces of the sample powder. In addition, the various vacuum systems used to extract the Ar are never perfect, and always contain a little air (and therefore atmospheric Ar). Atmospheric Ar contains other stable isotopes of Ar besides Ar-40 (the only Ar isotope produced by the decay of K-40). It's isotopic composition is: Ar-36, 0.34%; Ar-38, 0.06%; and Ar-40, 99.6%. By measuring the amount of Ar-36 in the sample, and assuming that the only Ar initially in the mineral, or that might have contaminated the sample during later handling has an atmospheric composition, one can subtract off the "atmospheric contribution" to the amount of Ar-40 measured, and determine the amount of Ar-40 produced by radioactive decay. It is then a simple matter to calculate the age of the sample. This method has four assumptions: (1) that the system has been closed with respect to K since it formed; (2) that the only Ar initially present in the sample when it formed had atmospheric composition; (3) that no Ar has left the sample since it formed; and (4) that only atmospheric Ar may have been added to the sample at any time. (One also takes for granted that the laws of physics and chemistry have not changed in unknown ways over time.) The consequences of each of these assumptions being violated are discussed below. Before doing this, it is important to understand that although K is a common constituent of minerals, forming chemical bonds with the surrounding atoms, when a K-40 atom decays to Ar-40, the crystal suddenly finds itself with a Ar atom where a K atom should be. This is an energetically unfavorable situation and the crystal would "like" to heal itself by getting rid of the Ar atom. In order to do this, the atoms in the crystal must reorganize themselves (diffuse). At low temperatures, this process is exceedingly slow, however at elevated temperatures, diffusion can become more rapid. Typically, the rate of diffusion increases exponentially with 1/T (D = D0 * exp( -E/RT), where D0, E and R are constants). For typical minerals used in dating, the loss of Ar due to diffusion is negligible below about 300 deg C, and can be nearly complete above that temperature. 1) System closed with respect to K. -- Under some conditions, a K-containing mineral can gain or lose potasium, either by exchanging some other alkali, like Na, for the K or by recrystallizing. If one could remove K without losing any Ar, then this would result in the calculation of an incorrectly old age, if one adds K without changing the Ar content, the the age would be too young. However, since K is an integral part of mineral structures, while Ar is not, it is usually impossible to gain or lose K without completely removing all the Ar from the mineral. When this happens, the isotopic clock is reset to the time at which this disturbance occurred, and the age one calculates is not that for the original formation of the mineral, but the YOUNGER age corresponding to the time at which the system was disturbed. 2 and 4) Only atmospheric Ar initially, or added later. -- This is a relatively uncommon problem, however, consider the case in which a rock (composed of a number of minerals) is buried deep in the earth's crust, where it is heated up. The minerals will start to undergo solid-state reactions, converting into a new assemblage of minerals that are stable at the higher temperature and pressure conditions present at depth. This process is known as metamorphism, and metamorphic rocks form one of the three major classes of rocks. As the minerals react, they will release any trapped Ar produced by K-40 decay. The Ar present in this environment (i.e., as an interstitial fluid between the mineral grains) is thus richer in Ar-40 than is atmospheric Ar, and may approach pure Ar-40 in composition. If a new mineral forms and entraps some of this Ar, then the new minerals will have an "excess" of initial Ar-40. If one trys to date this sample, it will yield an anomalously OLD age. Though rare, this phenomenon has been documented in a number of cases. Fortunately, there is a newer K-Ar dating technique that can identify such cases and correctly account for the isotopic composition of the initial Ar in a sample. This technique is called the Ar-40/Ar-39 method, the details of which would add another few pages to this already overlong message. 3) No Ar escape from the sample since it formed. -- This is by far the most common problem with K-Ar dating. As I mentioned before, at temperatures above a few hundred degrees C, Ar diffuses out of minerals fairly rapidly. Because of the exponential dependence of diffusion rate on temperature, the temperature range over which a given mineral goes from being "closed" to "open" with respect to Ar diffusion is very small. There is thus a "closure temperature" for a given mineral that depends on the characteristics of that mineral, below which, Ar is quantitatively retained and above which, Ar is lost. The extent of Ar-loss is dependent on the details of the time-temperature history of the sample. Loss of Ar without a corresponding loss of K, will, of course, result in incorrectly YOUNG ages. Again, the Ar-40/Ar-39 dating method offers significant advantages in detecting, and sometimes being able to "see through" the effect of the loss. Because the closure temperatures for Ar in most minerals are relatively low (on the order of 300 deg C), the K-Ar system is the most easily "reset" of all the isotopic clocks used in dating rocks. For that reason, it is not usually used to date ancient rocks. It is most useful for dating either the time of metamorphism or dating rocks that have had simple geologic histories and have never been deeply buried. -!- TBBS v2.1/NM ! Origin: Diablo Valley PCUG-BBS, Walnut Creek, CA <415-943-6238> (1:161/55)

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank