Consistency in the application of one's moral principles is apparently difficult to achiev

---
Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

Consistency in the application of one's moral principles is apparently difficult to achieve on the part of some moralizers. Consider the following -- Joseph Fletcher, a Protestant spokesman for voluntary euthanasia wrote: "A commission of American Prostestants recently concluded that the mass extermination of civilians by atom bomb blasts can be 'just,' although many members of the commission would hesitate to agree that fatal suffering could be ended righteously for one of the victims burned and charred externally and internally, not even as a response to the victim's pleas." Thoughts -- The mass extermination by atomic bomb is "just," but ending the life of one of these survivors, who is horribly burned, internal and external, is "unjust." IF he had died in the blast then that would have been a moral act, BUT IF he survived as a charred body and pleaded to have his suffering ended by taking his life -- THAT would be an immoral act. Ending the suffering caused by the moral atom bomb is immoral. If any readers can discover any redeeming aspect to this reasoning, please reply. -- Robert Lockard

---

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank