[Welcome to Mercury Center]
[Day Two]
[Dark Alliance]
Frames: [ Enable | Disable ]
Drug expert: 'Crack' born in San Francisco Bay Area in '74
It was a failed attempt to copy something else
Published: Aug. 19, 1996 [Other stories]
BY GARY WEBB Shadowy
Mercury News Staff Writer origins of
'crack'
THOUGH MIAMI AND LOS ANGELES are commonly regarded as the epidemic
twin cradles of ''crack'' cocaine, the first Role of
government-financed study of cocaine smoking concluded CIA-linked
that it was actually born here, in the San Francisco Bay agents a
Area, in January 1974. well-protected
secret until
After comedian Richard Pryor nearly immolated himself now
during a cocaine-smoking binge in 1980, the National
Institute on Drug Abuse hired UCLA drug expert Ronald K. San
Siegel to look into the then-unfamiliar practice. Siegel, Francisco
the first scientist to document crack's use in the United agent
States, traced the smoking habit back to 1930, when thought she
Colombians first started it. was onto
something
Translation problem big
Meneses'
But what was being smoked south of the border -- a trail was
paste-like substance called basé (bah-SAY) -- was very getting warm
different from what Californians were putting in their when her
pipes, Siegel found, even though they called it the same superiors
thing: free base. took her off
the case
Basé was a crude, toxics-laden precursor to cocaine
powder. On the other hand, free base (which later became
known as crack or rock), was cocaine powder that had been
reverse-engineered to make it smokable. When Bay Area
dealers tried recreating the drug they'd seen in South
America, Siegel learned, they'd screwed up.
''When they looked it up in the Merck Manual, they saw
cocaine base and thought, well, yeah, this is it,''
Siegel, a nationally known drug researcher, said in an
interview. ''They mispronounced it, misunderstood the
Spanish, and thought (basé) was cocaine base.''
Unintentional success
The base described in the organic chemistry handbook was
cocaine powder separated from its salts, a process easily
done with boiling water and baking soda. It was an
immediate, if unintentional, hit.
''They were wowed by it,'' Siegel said. ''They thought
they were smoking basé. They were not. They were smoking
something nobody on the planet had ever smoked before.''
Using the sales records of several major drug [web link]
paraphernalia companies, Siegel correlated crack's public
appearance with the appearance of base-making kits and Pictures of
glass pipes for smoking it. The sales records zeroed in crack
on the Bay Area. cocaine
Study never published
''We were able to show to our satisfaction that they were
directly responsible for distributing the habit
throughout the United States. Wherever they were selling
their kits, that's where we started getting the clinical
reports,'' Siegel said. ''It all started in Northern
California.''
His groundbreaking study was never published by the
government, purportedly for budgetary reasons. Siegel,
who said he grew concerned that the information would not
be made available to other researchers, published it
himself in an obscure medical journal in late 1982.
TUESDAY: The impact of the crack epidemic on the black
community, and why justice hasn't been for all.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to: Home | Dark Alliance:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Click here for Microsoft Windows 95]
| Mercury Center Home | Index | Feedback | NewsLibrary |
©1996 Mercury Center. The information you receive on-line from Mercury
Center is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The
copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or
repurposing of any copyright-protected material.