To: All Msg #63, Dec-10-92 09:29AM Subject: Speed

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

From: scharle To: All Msg #63, Dec-10-92 09:29AM Subject: Speed of light Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame From: (scharle) Message-ID: <> Reply-To: (scharle) Newsgroups:,sci.skeptic Unfortunately, I lost the attribution to this recent post: It was on sci.skeptic, and I am posting this to sci.skeptic and > New Light on an Old Problem > =========================== by Alan Montgomery > In 1981, Barry Setterfield a young Australian astronomer, gathered > and analyzed all the available data on 'c'. To his amazement he > discovered not only the systematic decrease of 'c' with time, but also > that the best mathematical relationship to fit the data was a > trigonometric formula: > 2 > c(t)=299.792 cosec (0.015)t > where t=time in years since creation ... Perhaps I have profoundly misunderstood what this is saying, so I will gladly accept correction. Is this really the famous varying speed of light equation? If I understand this correctly, there is at least one serious problem with it, which surely no scientist would have overlooked, so I must be really confused. Has anyone ever remarked on the fact that the cosecant will take an infinite value at zero (corresponding to the time of Creation) *and* at integral multiples of pi? Thus, when t = n * pi / .015, or approximately every 209 years since creation, the speed of light is infinite. Not only that, but at the intermediate points, the cosecant will be one, so that the speed of light will be 299.792. There are enough problems with creationism that we don't have to invent them, so if there is something wrong with my reasoning, please let me know. -- Tom Scharle |cm65n6@irishmvs(Bitnet) Room G003 Computing Center | University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539 USA


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank