To: Jesse C. Jones Subject: Disciples of Christ [sic] On (20 Jun 93) Jesse C. Jones w

Master Index Current Directory Index Go to SkepticTank Go to Human Rights activist Keith Henson Go to Scientology cult

Skeptic Tank!

From: Marilyn Burge To: Jesse C. Jones Subject: Disciples of Christ [sic] On (20 Jun 93) Jesse C. Jones wrote to Marilyn Burge... JC> -=> Quoting Marilyn Burge to Jesse C. Jones <=- JC> JC> MB> Some anthropologists think that the JC> MB> Twelve Disciples are nothing more than the twelve signs of the JC> Zodiac. JC> JC> More likely they correspond to the twelve tribes of Israel. My own JC> pet theory is that "the twelve" is a fictional creation to cover the JC> fact that there were _women_ in the inner circle! I have read lots of opinions regarding the origin of names, events, etc. in the Bible. There are as many theories as their are people with imaginations who have applied those imaginations to the question. Ancient Egyptian religions are ripe for the picking in this regard, if for no other reason than that they predate Christianity by millennia. Jesus could very well be a corruption of the word "Isis." The Twelve Diciples could very well be related to the Signs of the Zodiac, which is part of ancient beliefs. The flood myth has been told again and again by tribes older than the Jews. Some of the earlier renditions are: Culture Hero Warned by Hebrew Noah God Babylonian Utnapishtim Ea Persian Yima Ahura Mazda Hindu Vaivasvata Vishnu's Avatar Chaldean Xesuthras Chinos Greek Deucalion Prometheus Ostyaks Pairachta Turin Votyaks Noj Inmer Mexican Nata Titlachuhuan Algonquin ---- Glooscap Choctaw ---- The Great Spirit As you can see, mythology tends to be worldwide and not be a respector of time or place. Wherever a people have been inundated, they have developed a flood myth to tell their children and grandchildren what happened on that fateful day. From the perspective of those telling the story, the entire world was flooded (at least the portion of it that they are aware of). The story of Noah is no different in this regard. Those who take the story literally are missing the point of the story, and missing what scripture is trying to tell them. It doesn't matter if every word in the Bible is a myth, lie, allegory, or whatever. That has nothing to do with whether there is or not not a god. All it would mean if the entire book was fiction is that we would have no direct knowledge of the Mind of God. Would that be so terrible? Not really. If we live loving lives, we benefit and the rest of humanity benefits, so what have we got to lose? Tenaciously hanging onto the literalness of scripture is nothing more than a subliminal grasping at faith that is so tenuous that it will not stand the revelation of one erroneous or illiteral word being contained between the covers of the book. If faith hangs on every word being exactly true in the literal sense, then a person is forced to deny all knowledge that has been gained by humanity over the last several millennia. That is far too retro for me to even consider. I am not afraid of learning. In fact, to my way of thinking, one of the biggest sins a person can commit is the sin of being afraid to learn, regardless of where that knowledge may take them. To give up learning is to die a worse than physical death.


E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank